Systems and methods for resolving advertisement placement conflicts

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are described herein for resolving advertisement placement conflicts. Specifically, a number of parameters may be entered into a system in order to distribute advertisements into advertisement slots. In many instances, a combination of these parameters causes a conflict in the system where all the parameters cannot be applied in order to place advertisements into advertisement slots. The conflict may be resolved by using an advertisement assignment model to determine which parameters may be relaxed in order to arrive at an optimal solution that violates a smallest number of parameters having the least priority. When such a solution is found, the advertisement assignment model may be modified and advertisements may be placed into advertisement slots based on the modified advertisement assignment model.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.62/407,759, filed Oct. 13, 2016, the disclosure of which is herebyincorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Various advertisement assignment systems are currently available tousers. Some of these systems enable a user (e.g., an advertiser) toassign multiple advertisements to multiple advertisement slots,respectively. In certain instances, these assignments create conflictsthat prevent advertisements to be properly assigned to advertisementslots. Current advertisement assignment systems are not able to dealwith these conflicts.

SUMMARY

Therefore, systems and methods are described herein for resolvingadvertisement placement conflicts. Specifically, a number of parametersmay be entered into a system in order to assign advertisements toadvertisement slots. For example, one of the parameters may instruct thesystem to keep the cost to a specific advertiser under one milliondollars for a specific time period. Another parameter may instruct thesystem to evenly spread the advertisement slots between differentadvertisers for a specific time period. In some instances, a combinationof these parameters causes a conflict in the system where the system isnot able to apply all the parameters in order to place advertisementsinto advertisement slots. The conflict may be resolved by using anadvertisement assignment model to determine which parameters may berelaxed in order to arrive at an optimal solution that violates asmallest number of parameters having the least priority. When such asolution is found, the advertisement assignment model may be modifiedand advertisements may be placed into advertisement slots based on themodified advertisement assignment model.

In some aspects, an advertisement assignment application may be used toresolve the advertisement placement conflicts. It should be noted thatthe system for resolving advertisement placement conflicts will bedescribed using the advertisement assignment application. However, thesystem may be implemented using one or more applications on differenthardware configurations.

The advertisement assignment application may receive multiple parametersincluded in an advertisement assignment model that are to be used toplace advertisements into advertisement slots. Specifically, theadvertisement assignment application may receive an advertisementassignment model that includes a plurality of parameters that define howa plurality of advertisements should be assigned to a plurality ofadvertisement slots. For example, five advertisement slots may beavailable for placement of ten possible different advertisements fromthree advertisers (e.g., four advertisements from one advertiser andthree advertisements from each of the other two advertisers). Thisinformation along with input parameters (e.g., each advertiser must haveat least one advertisement slot and other suitable input parameters) mayconstitute an advertisement assignment model. The advertisementassignment model may include any other and any number of parameters. Forexample, another parameter may indicate that advertiser A must have allof its advertisements placed into the advertisement slots.

The advertisement assignment application may analyze the advertisementassignment model in order to determine whether all the parameters may beproperly applied when placing advertisements into availableadvertisement slots. For example, the advertisement assignmentapplication may simulate an assignment of the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on theplurality of parameters. The advertisement assignment application mayiterate through each parameter in the model and simulate assigningadvertisements to advertisement slots based on those parameters. Whenall parameters are applied to the advertisement slots, the advertisementassignment application may generate simulation results.

In some instances, the simulation results may indicate that allparameters may not be applied to the advertisement slots withoutviolating at least one parameter. Specifically, the advertisementassignment application may determine, based on the simulating, thatthere is a conflict that prevents assigning the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots without violatinga parameter of the plurality of parameters. To continue with the exampleabove, the advertisement assignment model may include five advertisementslots, ten advertisements and three advertisers where a first advertiserhas four advertisements and the second and third advertisers have threeadvertisements each. The advertisement assignment model may have twoparameters. The first parameter may indicate that each advertiser mustbe allocated at least one advertisement slot, while the second parametermay indicate that the advertiser with four advertisements must have eachadvertisement fill an advertisement slot. It should be noted that farmore complex advertisement assignment models may be processed by theadvertisement assignment application, and this particular advertisementassignment model is used for illustration purposes.

The advertisement assignment application may determine that bothparameters may not be applied to the advertisement slots because thoseparameters create a conflict. Specifically, if each advertiser gets oneadvertisement slot the advertiser with four advertisements cannot beallocated an advertisement slot for each advertisement as there are onlyfive advertisement slots. The reverse is also true, where, if theadvertiser with four advertisements is allocated an advertisement slotfor each advertisement, then each advertiser cannot be allocated atleast one advertisement slot of the total of five advertisement slots.

The advertisement assignment application may, in response to thedetermination above, attempt to resolve the conflict. Specifically, theadvertisement assignment application may, in response to thedetermining, retrieve a respective parameter score for each parameter ofthe plurality of parameters, where each parameter score indicates animportance of the corresponding parameter. In the example above, theadvertisement assignment application may retrieve a parameter score forthe first parameter. The parameter score may indicate that the firstparameter may not be particularly important because the system mayallocate other advertisement slots to the advertisers on a differentday. Thus, the parameter score associated with the first parameter maybe a low number (e.g., five). However, the second parameter may be veryimportant, for example, because there is a contractual obligation owedto the first advertiser for those advertisement slots. Thus, the secondparameter score may be high (e.g., fifty).

The advertisement assignment application may calculate a total parameterscore for the advertisement assignment model based on the retrievedparameter scores. For example, the advertisement assignment applicationmay calculate a sum of the two parameter scores retrieved above (i.e.,fifty-five). In some embodiments, parameter scores may be weighted basedon the importance of the specific parameter in the specificadvertisement assignment model.

The media guidance may identify at least one parameter to remove fromthe advertisement assignment model by taking the actions describedbelow. The advertisement assignment application may select at least oneconflict parameter, whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel causes the conflict to be resolved. The above-exemplifiedadvertisement assignment model may include other parameters. Forexample, a third parameter may indicate that the second advertiser musthave at least one advertisement slot. Also, a fourth parameter mayindicate that the third advertiser must have at least one advertisementslot. Each of the third and the fourth parameters may have a parameterscore of five. In this example, the advertisement assignment applicationmay identify that removing the second parameter or the first parameterresolves the conflict.

The advertisement assignment application may calculate the parameterscores based on removing one or more parameters to resolve the conflict.Specifically, the advertisement assignment application may calculate aplurality of different total parameter scores based on differentconfigurations of the plurality of parameters in the advertisementassignment model, where each calculated different total parameter scoreis based on the removal, from the advertisement assignment model, ofdifferent ones of the at least one conflict parameter. For example, inthe advertisement model described above, the four parameters may have asum of parameter scores equal to sixty-five. The advertisementassignment application may determine that the first and the secondparameters are in conflict and that removing one of those parametersresolves the conflict. The advertisement assignment application maycalculate a sum of the parameters, first excluding the first parameterand then excluding the second parameter, or vice versa, to determinethat the sum of the parameters without the first parameter is sixty andthe sum without the second parameter is fifteen.

The advertisement assignment application may determine a subset of allparameters where the total parameter score is changed the least and alsowhere the least parameters are removed. Specifically, the advertisementassignment application may determine, based on the different totalparameter scores, a configuration of the plurality of parameters fromthe different configurations that minimizes a change to the totalparameter score and minimizes a number of conflict parameters removedfrom the advertisement assignment model. For example, the advertisementassignment application may select a configuration where the firstparameter is removed because the sum of the parameter scores with thefirst parameter removed constitutes the least change. It should be notedthat in some embodiments multiple configurations may be identified whereremoving different parameters leads to multiple configurations with thesame total parameter score. In those instances, the advertisementassignment application may determine a configuration where the leastnumber of parameters are removed. In some embodiments, differentconfigurations may be identified using a feasibility relaxationalgorithm for mixed integer linear programs. In some embodiments theadvertisement assignment application may minimize the total number ofthe changes to the advertisement assignment model. Those changes mayinclude both the number of parameters removed and the change in thetotal parameter score.

The advertisement assignment application may modify the advertisementassignment model based on the determined configuration. Specifically,the advertisement assignment application may modify the advertisementassignment model to remove the at least one conflict parameter from theadvertisement assignment model according to the configuration thatminimizes the change to the total parameter score and minimizes thenumber of conflict parameters removed from the advertisement assignmentmodel. For example, the advertisement assignment application may removethe first parameter in the advertisement assignment model exemplifiedabove.

The advertisement assignment application may assign the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on themodified advertisement assignment model.

In some embodiments, each parameter may have a system parameter scoreand a user-defined parameter score. The system parameter scores may beassigned by the entity managing and maintaining the advertisementassignment application while the user-defined parameter scores may beassigned by an advertiser or a user inputting parameters into theadvertisement assignment model. The advertisement assignment applicationmay retrieve the parameter score for each parameter of the plurality ofparameters by taking the following actions.

The advertisement assignment application may determine which parametershave associated user-defined scores in addition to the system parameterscores. Specifically, the advertisement assignment application maygenerate a first subset of parameters in the plurality of parameters,where each parameter in the first subset of parameters has an associateduser-defined parameter score and a system parameter score. For example,the advertisement assignment application may determine that the firstparameter and the third parameter exemplified above have user-definedparameter scores in addition to system parameter scores.

The advertisement assignment application may determine whether eachparameter with the user-defined parameter score is configured in such away that the system parameter score may be overridden by theuser-defined parameter score. Specifically, the advertisement assignmentapplication may determine, for each parameter in the first subset ofparameters, whether the system parameter score can be overridden by theuser-defined parameter score. For example, the advertisement assignmentapplication may determine that the system parameter score for the firstparameter can be overridden while the system parameter score for thethird parameter cannot be overridden.

The advertisement assignment application may identify parameters withparameter scores that can be overridden and parameters with parameterscores that cannot be overridden. Specifically, the advertisementassignment application may generate a second subset of parameters thatincludes parameters from the first subset of parameters with systemparameter scores that can be overridden, and generate a third subset ofparameters that includes parameters from the first subset of parametersthat includes system parameter scores that cannot be overridden. Forexample, the advertisement assignment application may assign the firstparameter to one subset and the third parameter to a different subset,based on whether each of the first and third parameters can beoverridden.

The advertisement assignment application may retrieve user-definedparameter scores for the second subset and system parameter scores forthe third subset. For example, the advertisement assignment applicationmay retrieve the user-defined parameter score for the first parameterand a system parameter score for the second parameter.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application may use afeasibility relaxation algorithm for mixed integer linear programs todetermine which configuration to select. Specifically, the advertisementassignment application may, when determining, based on the differenttotal parameter scores, the configuration of the plurality of parametersfrom the different configurations, execute a feasibility relaxationalgorithm for mixed integer linear programs. For example, theadvertisement assignment application may transmit the parameters of theadvertisement assignment model together with advertisements andadvertisement slots to a server executing the algorithm and receive inresponse different configurations that may be used to placeadvertisements into advertisement slots without incurring a conflictbetween parameters.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine the at least one conflict parameter whose removal from theadvertisement assignment model causes the conflict to be resolved byperforming the following actions. The advertisement assignmentapplication may rank each parameter of the plurality of parameters basedon a respective parameter score, where a highest-ranked parameter isassociated with a lowest parameter score and the lowest-ranked parameteris associated with the highest parameter score. For example, theadvertisement assignment application may be processing an advertisementassignment model with three parameters. The first parameter may have aparameter score of fifty. The second parameter may have a parameterscore of ten, and the third parameter may have a parameter score offive. The advertisement assignment application may rank the thirdparameter highest, the second parameter second highest, and the firstparameter lowest.

The advertisement assignment application may select a second pluralityof parameters by removing the highest-ranked parameter from theplurality of parameters. To continue the example above, theadvertisement assignment application may remove the third parameter fromthe advertisement assignment model above and select the first and secondparameters for the second plurality of parameters.

The advertisement assignment application may compare the secondplurality of parameters with parameters of each configuration of thedifferent configurations. For example, the advertisement assignmentapplication may compare the first and second parameters with theparameters of each configuration that resolves the conflict.

The advertisement assignment application may determine whether thesecond plurality of parameters corresponds to one of the configurationsthat resolve the conflict. Specifically, the advertisement assignmentapplication may determine, based on comparing the second plurality ofparameters with parameters of each configuration of the differentconfigurations, whether the second plurality of parameters matches anyconfiguration of the different configurations. For example, theadvertisement assignment application may determine, based on thecomparison, whether there is a configuration that resolves the conflictthat includes only the first and second parameter.

The advertisement assignment application may, in response to determiningthat the second plurality of parameters matches a configuration of thedifferent configurations, determine that the at least one conflictparameter is the highest-ranked parameter. To continue with the exampleabove, the second parameter may be determined to be the at least oneconflict parameter.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application may, inresponse to determining that the second plurality of parameters does notmatch any configuration of the different configurations, select a thirdplurality of parameters by removing the second highest-ranked parameterfrom the first plurality of parameters. To continue with the exampleabove, if removing the first and second parameters do not match one ofthe configurations that resolve the conflict, the advertisementassignment application may select the next highest-ranked parameter(i.e., the second parameter) for removal from the advertisementassignment model.

The advertisement assignment application may select a plurality ofparameters without the second highest-ranked parameter. Specifically,the advertisement assignment application may compare the third pluralityof parameters with parameters of each configuration of the differentconfigurations. For example, the advertisement assignment applicationmay compare parameters for each configuration that resolves the conflictwith the first and third parameters.

The advertisement assignment application may determine that removing thesecond highest-ranked parameter does not resolve the conflict. Theadvertisement assignment application may determine, based on comparingthe third plurality of parameters with parameters of each configurationof the different configurations, that the third plurality of parametersdoes not match any configuration of the different configurations (i.e.,there is one configuration that resolves the conflict that has only thesecond highest-ranked parameter removed. For example, the advertisementassignment application may determine that there is no configuration thatresolves the conflict that includes only the first parameter and thethird parameter.

The advertisement assignment application may remove the twohighest-ranked parameters from the advertisement assignment model anddetermine whether that action resolves the conflict. Specifically, theadvertisement assignment application may compare a fourth plurality ofparameters with parameters of each of the different configurations,where the fourth plurality of parameters comprises the first pluralityof parameters without both the highest-ranked parameter and the secondhighest-ranked parameter. For example, the advertisement assignmentapplication may remove the third and second parameters and determinewhether there is a configuration that matches just the first parameterthat resolves the conflict.

The advertisement assignment application may, in response to determiningthat parameters of any configuration of the different configurationsmatches the fourth plurality of parameters, determine that the at leastone conflict parameter includes the highest-ranked parameter and thesecond highest-ranked parameter. For example, the advertisementassignment application may determine that the third and secondparameters constitute the at least one conflict parameter.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine the configuration of the plurality of parameters from thedifferent configurations that minimizes the change to the totalparameter score and minimizes the number of conflict parameters removedfrom the advertisement assignment model by taking the following actions.The advertisement assignment application may select, from the differentconfigurations, a set of configurations with the lowest change to thetotal parameter score, and determine, for each configuration in the setof configurations, a number of removed conflict parameters. Theadvertisement assignment application may select a configuration from theset of configurations with the smallest number of removed conflictparameters. For example, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine that there are five configurations that have the lowest changein the total parameter score. The advertisement assignment applicationmay determine the number of parameters that were removed, and select theconfiguration with the lowest number of removed parameters.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine the configuration of the plurality of parameters from thedifferent configurations that minimizes the change to the totalparameter score and minimizes the number of conflict parameters removedfrom the advertisement assignment model by taking the following actions.The advertisement assignment application may select, from the differentconfigurations, a set of configurations with a smallest number ofremoved conflict parameters, and determine, for each configuration inthe set of configurations, a change in a respective total parameterscore. The advertisement assignment application may select aconfiguration from the set of configurations with a smallest change inthe respective total parameter score. For example, the advertisementassignment application may determine that there are five configurationsthat have the lowest change in the total parameter score. Theadvertisement assignment application may determine a change in a totalparameter score for each of the five configurations, and select theconfiguration with the smallest change in the parameter score.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application may enablethe user to override the configuration selected by the system to resolvethe conflict. The advertisement assignment application may generate forsimultaneous display both the configuration that minimizes the change tothe total parameter score and minimizes the number of conflictparameters removed from the advertisement assignment model and an optionthat enables a user to choose a different configuration that resolvesthe conflict. The advertisement assignment application may, in responseto a user selection of the option, generate for display the differentconfigurations, and in response to a user selection of one of thedifferent configurations, assign the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on the user selection of the oneof the different configurations. For example, a user may want tooverride the default configuration that resolves the conflict withanother configuration. The advertisement assignment application mayprovide the user with such a mechanism by presenting to the user anoption to do so and when the user selects the option, the advertisementassignment application may enable the user to select the configurationfrom the different configurations that resolve the conflict that theuser desires.

In some embodiments, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine the at least one conflict parameter whose removal from theadvertisement assignment model causes the conflict to be resolved bytaking the following actions. The advertisement assignment applicationmay rank each parameter of the plurality of parameters based on arespective parameter score, where a highest-ranked parameter isassociated with a lowest parameter score and the lowest-ranked parameteris associated with the highest parameter score. For example, theadvertisement assignment application may be processing an advertisementassignment model with three parameters. The first parameter may have aparameter score of fifty. The second parameter may have a parameterscore of ten, and the third parameter may have a parameter score offive. The advertisement assignment application may rank the thirdparameter highest, the second parameter second highest, and the firstparameter lowest.

The advertisement assignment application may select the highest-rankedparameter and split it into two parameters. Specifically, theadvertisement assignment application may split the highest-rankedparameter into a first sub-parameter and a second sub-parameter. Forexample, the advertisement assignment application may be processing aparameter that indicates that each of two advertisers must be assignedat least one advertisement slot. The advertisement assignmentapplication may split that parameter into two sub-parameters. The firstsub-parameter may indicate that first advertiser one must have at leastone advertisement slot and the second sub-parameter may indicate thatthe second advertiser must have at least one advertisement slot.

The advertisement assignment application may generate a set ofparameters that includes the plurality of parameters without thehighest-ranked parameter, and simulate the assignment of the pluralityof advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on setof parameters and the first sub-parameter. For example, theadvertisement assignment application may simulate the assignment ofadvertisements to advertisement slots with the first sub-parameter, butwithout the second sub-parameter.

The advertisement assignment application may determine, based onsimulating the assignment of the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on a set of parameters and thefirst sub-parameter that there is no conflict that prevents assigningthe plurality of advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slotswithout violating at least one of the first sub-parameter and the set ofparameters. For example, the advertisement assignment application maydetermine that not including the second sub-parameter resolves theconflict. The advertisement assignment application may determine thatremoval of the highest-ranked parameter and addition of the firstsub-parameter resolves the conflict.

The advertisement assignment application may determine whether thehighest-ranked parameter can be split into multiple sub-parameters bytaking the following actions. The advertisement assignment applicationmay determine whether the highest-ranked parameter is associated with aplurality of advertisers and a plurality of advertisement slots, andsimulate splitting the highest-ranked parameter into a plurality ofsub-parameters, where each sub-parameter of the plurality ofsub-parameters is associated with one advertiser and at least oneadvertisement slot. The advertisement assignment application may, inresponse to successfully simulating the splitting, determine that thehighest-ranked parameter can be split into multiple parameters. Forexample, a parameter may indicate that each of three advertisers must beassigned at least one advertisement slot. The advertisement assignmentapplication may determine that the parameter is associated with multipleadvertisers. The advertisement assignment application may split theparameter according to each advertiser. Thus, the first sub-parametermay indicate that the first advertiser must have at least oneadvertisement slot. The second sub-parameter may indicate that thesecond advertiser must have at least one advertisement slot, and thethird sub-parameter may indicate that the third advertiser must have atleast one advertisement slot.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an illustration of a display screen, in accordance withsome embodiments of the disclosure;

FIG. 2 shows an illustrative embodiment of a display screen that may beused to provide media guidance application listings and other mediaguidance information, in accordance with some embodiments of thedisclosure;

FIG. 3 shows another illustrative embodiment of a display screen thatmay be used to provide media guidance application listings, inaccordance with some embodiments of the disclosure;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an illustrative device, in accordance withsome embodiments of the disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an illustrative media system, in accordancewith some embodiments of the disclosure;

FIG. 6 depicts an illustrative process for resolving advertisementplacement conflicts, in accordance with some embodiments of thisdisclosure;

FIG. 7 depicts an illustrative process for determining whetherparameters of the advertisement assignment model cause a conflict, inaccordance with some embodiments of this disclosure;

FIG. 8 depicts an illustrative process for calculating a total parameterscore, in accordance with some embodiments of this disclosure; and

FIG. 9 depicts an illustrative process for determining one or moreconflict parameters whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel resolves the conflict.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Systems and methods are described herein for resolving advertisementplacement conflicts. Specifically, a number of parameters may be enteredinto a system in order to place advertisements into advertisement slots.For example, one of the parameters may instruct the system to keep thecost to a specific advertiser under one million dollars for a specifictime period. Another parameter may instruct the system to evenly spreadthe advertisement slots between different advertisers for a specifictime period. In many instances, a combination of these parameters causesa conflict in the system where all the parameters cannot be applied inorder to place advertisements into advertisement slots. The conflict maybe resolved by using an advertisement assignment model to determinewhich parameters may be relaxed in order to arrive at an optimalsolution that violates a smallest number of parameters having the leastpriority. When such a solution is found, the advertisement assignmentmodel may be modified and advertisements may be placed intoadvertisement slots based on the modified advertisement assignmentmodel. As referred to herein, the term “advertisement assignment model”refers to a collection of parameters, advertisement slots andadvertisements where the parameters may be applied to advertisements andadvertisement slots in order to assign advertisements to advertisementslots based on those parameters. In some embodiments, an advertisementassignment model may include other entities (e.g., advertisers). Asreferred to herein, the term “parameter” refers to one or morecriterions for assigning advertisements to advertisement slots. Forexample, a parameter may indicate that an advertisement associated witha specific advertiser must be assigned an advertisement slot during aparticular time.

In some embodiments, control circuitry may implement the actionsrequired to resolve advertisement placing conflicts. The controlcircuitry may receive multiple parameters with an advertisementassignment model that are to be used to place advertisements intoadvertisement slots. Specifically, the control circuitry may receive anadvertisement assignment model that includes a plurality of parametersthat define how a plurality of advertisements should be assigned to aplurality of advertisement slots. For example, FIG. 1 may be used toillustrate an example of one possible advertisement assignment modeltogether with advertisements that are placed into advertisement slotsbased on the advertisement assignment model. Advertisement assignmentmodel 102 that may include a plurality of parameters 104. Each parameter104 may be selectable. Upon selection of parameter 104, another displaymay be generated where the parameter may be modified or removed. Newparameters may be added to advertisement assignment model 102 byselecting a space below parameters 2. Each parameter 104 may have anassociated parameter score 106. Parameter scores 106 may be displayednext to the corresponding parameter. Advertisement schedule 108 may alsobe displayed together with the advertisement assignment model. Theadvertisement schedule may include days of the week on the horizontalaxis and times of the day on the vertical axis. Media assetrepresentations 110 may be displayed in the appropriate time slots. Eachrepresentation 110 may include a plurality of advertisement slots andeach advertisement slot may include an advertisement identifierassociated with the respective slot.

The control circuitry may analyze the advertisement assignment model inorder to determine whether each parameter may be properly applied,together with the other parameters, when assigning advertisements intoavailable advertisement slots. Specifically, the control circuitry maysimulate an assignment of the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on the plurality of parameters.For example, the control circuitry may select a first parameter andconvert the first parameter into one or more mathematical functions thatdictate assignments of advertisements to advertisement slots. Thecontrol circuitry may iterate through each parameter to convert thoseparameters into mathematical functions. These mathematical functions areapplied to the advertisements and advertisement slots in order to assignthe advertisements to the advertisement slots based on the parameters.When all parameters are applied to the advertisement slots, the controlcircuitry may generate simulation results.

In some instances, the simulation results may indicate that allparameters may not be applied to the advertisement slots, withoutviolating at least one parameter. Specifically, the control circuitrymay determine, based on the simulating, that there is a conflict thatprevents assigning the plurality of advertisements to the plurality ofadvertisement slots without violating a parameter of the plurality ofparameters. For example, when the control circuitry iteratively appliesthe mathematical functions described above to the advertisement slots,an error may be detected such that a certain function cannot beiteratively applied. In one embodiment, an indication of the conflict(not shown) may be added to display 100 in order to inform the user.

The control circuitry may, in response to the determination above,attempt to resolve the conflict. Specifically, the control circuitrymay, in response to the determining, retrieve a respective parameterscore for each parameter of the plurality of parameters, where eachparameter score indicates an importance of the corresponding parameter.The control circuitry may execute a feasibility relaxation algorithm formixed integer linear programs. As referred to herein, the term“feasibility relaxation algorithm for mixed integer linear programs”refers to a modeling strategy, using linear algebra that iterativelyremoves, modifies or performs a combination of removing and modifying ofone or more parameters from a conflicting set of parameters in order toarrive at a model with no conflicting parameters.

The control circuitry may calculate a total parameter score for theadvertisement assignment model based on the retrieved parameter scores.For example, the control circuitry may calculate a sum of all theparameter scores. In some embodiments, parameter scores may be weightedbased on the importance of the specific parameter in the specificadvertisement assignment model.

The control circuitry may select at least one parameter to modify orremove from the advertisement assignment model by taking the actionsdescribed below. The control circuitry may determine at least oneconflict parameter, whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel causes the conflict to be resolved. In some embodiments, thecontrol circuitry may modify a parameter instead of removing it. Forexample, if a parameter indicates that a specific advertiser must beassigned at least four advertisement slots, the control circuitry maymodify the parameter to indicate that the specific advertiser must beassigned at least three advertisement slots. In some embodiments, thecontrol circuitry may remove some parameters and modify others. Forexample, the control circuitry may receive, as output from thefeasibility relaxation algorithm for mixed integer linear programs,output of different configurations that resolve the conflict. Thecontrol circuitry may iterate through each received configuration. Foreach configuration the control circuitry may compare the parameters ofthe given configuration with the parameters of the originally receivedadvertisement assignment model. The control circuitry may, based on thecomparison, determine which parameters have been removed from eachconfiguration in order to resolve the conflict.

The control circuitry may calculate the parameter scores based onremoving one or more parameters to resolve the conflict. Specifically,the control circuitry may calculate a plurality of different totalparameter scores based on different configurations of the plurality ofparameters in the advertisement assignment model, where each calculateddifferent total parameter score is based on the removal, from theadvertisement assignment model, of different ones of the at least oneconflict parameter. The control circuitry may iterate through eachconfiguration received from the feasibility relaxation algorithm formixed integer linear programs and add a score for each parameter thathas not been removed as part of the configuration.

The control circuitry may determine a subset of all parameters where thetotal parameter score is changed the least and also where the leastparameters are removed. Specifically, the control circuitry maydetermine, based on the different total parameter scores, aconfiguration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations that minimizes a change to the total parameter score andminimizes a number of conflict parameters removed from the advertisementassignment model. For example, the control circuitry may generate a setof configurations that includes configurations with lowest change in theparameter score. The control circuitry may select a configuration thathas the least number of parameters removed.

The control circuitry may modify the advertisement assignment modelbased on the determined configuration. Specifically, the controlcircuitry may modify the advertisement assignment model to remove the atleast one conflict parameter from the advertisement assignment modelaccording to the configuration that minimizes the change to the totalparameter score and minimizes the number of conflict parameters removedfrom the advertisement assignment model. For example, the controlcircuitry may compare the parameters of the determined configurationwith the parameters of the originally-received advertisement assignmentmodel. Based on the comparison, the control circuitry, may determinewhich parameters should be removed from the advertisement assign modelto resolve the conflict. In another example, the parameter or parametersthat have been removed from the configuration may have been stored aspart of an action described above. In this example, the controlcircuitry may retrieve the stored parameter or parameters and use theretrieved information to remove the appropriate parameter or parametersform the advertisement assignment model.

The control circuitry may assign the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on the modified advertisementassignment model. It should be noted that, in some embodiments, thecontrol circuitry may, instead of removing one or more parameters,modify one or more parameters in order to resolve the conflict. Forexample, if a parameter indicates that each advertiser must have atleast one advertisement slot and there are three advertisers, thecontrol circuitry may, instead of removing the parameter, modify theparameter to indicate that two of the three advertisers must have atleast one advertisement slot.

In some embodiments, each parameter may have a system parameter scoreand a user-defined parameter score. The system parameter scores may beassigned by the entity managing and maintaining the advertisementassignment application while the user-defined parameter scores may beassigned by an advertiser or a user inputting parameters into theadvertisement assignment model. As referred to herein, the term“user-defined parameter score” refers to a parameter score that may beset by a user of the system. It should be noted that in some embodimentsan administrator of the system may assign permissions to a specific useror a group of users to assign user-defined parameter scores. As referredherein, the term “system parameter score” refers to a parameter scoredefined by a system administrator and that cannot be modified by a user.The control circuitry may retrieve the parameter score for eachparameter of the plurality of parameters by taking the followingactions.

The control circuitry may determine which parameters have associateduser-defined scores in addition to the system parameter scores.Specifically, the control circuitry may generate a first subset ofparameters in the plurality of parameters, where each parameter in thefirst subset of parameters has an associated user-defined parameterscore and a system parameter score. For example, the control circuitrymay retrieve from a database a plurality of entries where each entry isassociated with a specific parameter. The control circuitry may storethose entries in one or more data structures that can be accessed toretrieve different fields.

The database may be stored locally on the same device where the controlcircuitry resides or on a remote device. Each entry may include fieldsfor parameter identification (e.g., an alphanumeric number), a systemparameter score, a user-defined parameter score, and an indicator ofwhether the system parameter score can be overridden. Other suitablefields may be included in the entry (e.g., the time the parameter wascreated).

The control circuitry may determine whether each parameter with theuser-defined parameter score is configured in such a way that the systemparameter score may be overridden by the user-defined parameter score.Specifically, the control circuitry may determine, for each parameter inthe first subset of parameters, whether the system parameter score canbe overridden by the user-defined parameter score. For example, thecontrol circuitry may access the one or more data structures describedabove and retrieve, for each parameter the indicator that indicateswhether the system parameter score may be overridden with a user-definedparameter score. In some embodiments, the indicator may be a Booleanwhere a value of true indicates that the system parameter score may beoverridden and the value of false indicates that the system parameterscore may not be overridden. In other embodiments, the indicator may bea numeric or an alphanumeric value.

The control circuitry may generate subsets for those parameter scoresthat can be overridden and for those parameter scores that cannot beoverridden. Specifically, the control circuitry may generate a secondsubset of parameters that includes parameters from the first subset ofparameters with system parameter scores that can be overridden, andgenerate a third subset of parameters that includes parameters from thefirst subset of parameters that includes system parameter scores thatcannot be overridden. For example the control circuitry may create twodata structures, one for storing pointers pointing to parameters thathave system parameter scores that can be overridden and a second forstoring pointers pointing to parameters that have system parametersscores that cannot be overridden.

The control circuitry may retrieve user-defined parameter scores for thesecond subset and system parameter scores for the third subset. Forexample, the control circuitry may retrieve from the one or more datastructures described above, system parameter scores for the secondsubset and user-defined parameter scores from the third subset.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may use a feasibilityrelaxation algorithm for mixed integer linear programs to determinewhich configuration to select. Specifically, the control circuitry may,when determining, based on the different total parameter scores, theconfiguration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations, execute a feasibility relaxation algorithm for mixedinteger linear programs. For example, the control circuitry may transmitthe parameters of the advertisement assignment model together withadvertisements and advertisement slots to a server executing thealgorithm and receive in response different configurations that may beused to place advertisements into advertisement slots without incurringa conflict between parameters.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may determine the at leastone conflict parameter whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel causes the conflict to be resolved by performing the followingactions. The control circuitry may rank each parameter of the pluralityof parameters based on a respective parameter score, where thehighest-ranked parameter is associated with the lowest parameter scoreand the lowest-ranked parameter is associated with the highest parameterscore. For example, the control circuitry may iterate through eachparameter and retrieve a parameter score associated with each parameter.The control circuitry may sort the parameter scores lowest to highestand rank associated parameters in the same order. The control circuitrymay store (e.g., in a data structure) each parameter in the rankedorder. For example, the control circuitry may store an identificationvalue associated with each parameter in the data structure. In someembodiments, the control circuitry may store, in the data structure, apointer to each parameter in the ranked order.

The control circuitry may select a second plurality of parameters byremoving the highest-ranked parameter from the plurality of parameters.For example, the control circuitry may generate a data structure thatincludes all the parameters except the highest ranked parameter. In someembodiments, the data structure may include pointers to other datastructures that includes the parameters and metadata associated with theparameters.

The control circuitry may compare the second plurality of parameterswith parameters of each configuration of the different configurations.For example, the control circuitry may iterate through each parameter inthe plurality of parameters and compare those parameters with parametersof the different configurations. In some embodiments, each parameter maybe assigned an identification value (e.g., a numeric string, analphanumeric string, a binary hash, or another suitable identification).The control circuitry may compare those identification values in orderto determine whether the second plurality of parameters matches one ofthe different configurations. It should be noted that in order for thematch to be found, each parameter in the second plurality of parametersmust match a parameter in a specific configuration, without otherunmatched parameters being present in the specific configuration.

The control circuitry may determine whether the second plurality ofparameters corresponds to one of the configurations that resolve theconflict. Specifically, the control circuitry may determine, based oncomparing the second plurality of parameters with parameters of eachconfiguration of the different configurations, whether the secondplurality of parameters matches any configuration of the differentconfigurations. For example, the control circuitry may determine whetherthere is a successful comparison with one of the configurations.

The control circuitry may, in response to determining that the secondplurality of parameters matches a configuration of the differentconfigurations, determine that the at least one conflict parameter isthe highest-ranked parameter. For example, the control circuitry maystore one or more parameters that are not part of the determinedconfiguration (i.e., those parameters whose removal causes the conflictto be resolved). In some embodiments, the control circuitry may storepointers to the one or more parameters. In yet other embodiments, thecontrol circuitry may generate a data structure that may store thedetermined configuration that causes the conflict to be resolved andalso stores pointers and/or identifiers of the parameters that wereremoved from the configuration.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may, in response todetermining that the second plurality of parameters does not match anyconfiguration of the different configurations, select a third pluralityof parameters by removing the second highest-ranked parameter from thefirst plurality of parameters. For example, the control circuitry mayaccess the data structure that stores the ranked parameters and retrievethe next ranked parameter. The control circuitry may generate a datastructure for the second plurality that includes identification valuesfor all the parameters except the next ranked parameter.

The control circuitry may compare a plurality of parameters without thesecond highest-ranked parameter with the different configurations.Specifically, the control circuitry may compare the third plurality ofparameters with parameters of each configuration of the differentconfigurations. For example, the control circuitry may iterate througheach parameter (e.g., through each parameter identification value) inthe third plurality of parameters and compare those values with theparameter identification values associated with parameters for eachdifferent configuration that resolves the conflict.

The control circuitry may determine that removing the secondhighest-ranked parameter does not resolve the conflict. Theadvertisement assignment application may determine, based on comparingthe third plurality of parameters with parameters of each configurationof the different configurations, that the third plurality of parametersdoes not match any configuration of the different configurations. Forexample, the control circuitry may determine that none of the differentconfigurations match the third plurality of parameters.

The control circuitry may remove the two highest-ranked parameters fromthe advertisement assignment model and determine whether that actionresolves the conflict. Specifically, the control circuitry may compare afourth plurality of parameters with parameters of each of the differentconfigurations, where the fourth plurality of parameters comprises thefirst plurality of parameters without both the highest-ranked parameterand the second highest-ranked parameter. For example, the controlcircuitry may iterate through each identification value associated witha respective parameter of the fourth plurality of parameters and comparethose values with identification values associated with each parameterin each different configuration that resolves the conflict.

The control circuitry may, in response to determining that parameters ofany configuration of the different configurations matches the fourthplurality of parameters, determine that the at least one conflictparameter includes the highest-ranked parameter and the secondhighest-ranked parameter. For example, the control circuitry maydetermine that there is a configuration that matches the fourthplurality of parameters. It should be noted that in instances where thefourth plurality of parameters doesn't match any differentconfiguration, the control circuitry may continue with the processselecting parameters in ranked order and comparing the differentconfigurations with sets of parameters such that the control circuitrymay first compare the set without the selected parameter, then the setwithout the selected parameter and one of previously selectedparameters. Thus the control circuitry may remove one parameter from theset, then iteratively remove all combinations of two parameters, theniteratively remove all combinations of three parameters, and so on.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may determine theconfiguration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations that minimizes the change to the total parameter scoreand minimizes the number of conflict parameters removed from theadvertisement assignment model by taking the following actions. Thecontrol circuitry may select, from the different configurations, a setof configurations with the lowest change to the total parameter score,and determine, for each configuration in the set of configurations, anumber of removed conflict parameters. The control circuitry may selecta configuration from the set of configurations with the smallest numberof removed conflict parameters. For example, the control circuitry mayiterate through all of the different configurations that resolve theconflict and calculate a total parameter score for each. The controlcircuitry may calculate the total parameter score by adding all theparameter scores of parameters associated with the given configurationthat resolves the conflict. In some embodiments, the control circuitrymay have already calculated the total parameter score and may havestored it. In these embodiments, the control circuitry may retrieve arespective total parameter score for each different configuration. Thecontrol circuitry may compare the total parameter scores and generate aset of configurations that all have a lowest score. The controlcircuitry may iterate through each configuration and determine therespective number of parameters that was removed from eachconfiguration. The control circuitry may select the configuration withthe least number of parameters removed.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may determine theconfiguration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations that minimizes the change to the total parameter scoreand minimizes the number of conflict parameters removed from theadvertisement assignment model by taking the following actions. Thecontrol circuitry may select, from the different configurations, a setof configurations with a smallest number of removed conflict parameters,and determine, for each configuration in the set of configurations, achange in a respective total parameter score. The control circuitry mayselect a configuration from the set of configurations with a smallestchange in the respective total parameter score. For example, the controlcircuitry may iterate through each configuration and determine thenumber of parameters that were removed from the respective configurationin order to resolve the conflict. The control circuitry may generate aset of configurations when the lowest number of parameters removed. Thecontrol circuitry may calculate, for each configuration in the set, atotal parameter score, by adding parameter scores of all parameters inthe configuration. In some embodiments, the control circuitry may havealready made the calculation and may retrieve the total parameter scoreassociated with each configuration. In yet some embodiments, the controlcircuitry may calculate the total parameter scores by determining thecombined score of the removed parameters for each respectiveconfiguration and iteratively subtract for each configuration thecombined score from the total parameter score of all the parameters inthe advertisement assignment model.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may enable the user tooverride the configuration selected by the system to resolve theconflict. The control circuitry may generate for simultaneous displayboth the configuration that minimizes the change to the total parameterscore and minimizes the number of conflict parameters removed from theadvertisement assignment model and an option that enables a user tochoose a different configuration that resolves the conflict. The controlcircuitry may, in response to a user selection of the option, generatefor display the different configurations, and in response to a userselection of one of the different configurations, assign the pluralityof advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on theuser selection of the one of the different configurations. For example,a user may want to override the default configuration that resolves theconflict with another configuration. The control circuitry may providethe user with such a mechanism by presenting to the user an option to doso and when the user selects the option, the control circuitry mayenable the user to select the configuration from the differentconfigurations that resolve the conflict that the user desires.

In some embodiments, the control circuitry may determine the at leastone conflict parameter whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel causes the conflict to be resolved by taking the followingactions. The control circuitry may rank each parameter of the pluralityof parameters based on a respective parameter score, where thehighest-ranked parameter is associated with a lowest parameter score andthe lowest-ranked parameter is associated with the highest parameterscore. For example, the control circuitry may iterate through eachparameter and retrieve a parameter score associated with each parameter.The control circuitry may sort the parameter scores lowest to highestand rank associated parameters in the same order. The control circuitrymay store (e.g., in a data structure) each parameter in the rankedorder. For example, the control circuitry may store an identificationvalue associated with each parameter in the data structure. In someembodiments, the control circuitry may store, in the data structure, apointer to each parameter in the ranked order.

The control circuitry may select the highest ranked parameter and splitit into two parameters. Specifically, the control circuitry may splitthe highest-ranked parameter into a first sub-parameter and a secondsub-parameter. For example, the control circuitry may be processing aparameter that is associated with a plurality of advertisers. Thecontrol circuitry may split that parameter into sub-parameters eachassociated with one advertiser and generate the sub-parameter based onthe portion of the parameter that is associated with that advertiser.

The control circuitry may generate a set of parameters that includes theplurality of parameters without the highest-ranked parameter, andsimulate the assignment of the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on set of parameters and thefirst sub-parameter. For example, the control circuitry may iteratethrough each sub-parameter and remove that sub-parameter from the set.The control circuitry may simulate the assignment of advertisements toadvertisement slots with each set.

The control circuitry may determine, based on simulating the assignmentof the plurality of advertisements to the plurality of advertisementslots based on a set of parameters and the first sub-parameter thatthere is no conflict that prevents assigning the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots without violatingat least one of the first sub-parameter and the set of parameters. Forexample, the control circuitry may determine a set of parameters(without a specific sub parameter) that resolves the conflict. Thecontrol circuitry may determine that removal of the highest-rankedparameter and addition of the first sub-parameter resolves the conflict.For example, the control circuitry may determine a set that resolves theconflict where the set includes parameter without the highest-rankedparameter, but with one or more sub-parameters that were generatedabove.

The control circuitry may determine whether the highest-ranked parametercan be split into multiple sub-parameters by taking the followingactions. The control circuitry may determine whether the highest-rankedparameter is associated with a plurality of advertisers and a pluralityof advertisement slots, and simulate splitting the highest-rankedparameter into a plurality of sub-parameters, where each sub-parameterof the plurality of sub-parameters is associated with one advertiser andat least one advertisement slot. The control circuitry may, in responseto successfully simulating the splitting, determine that thehighest-ranked parameter can be split into multiple parameters. Forexample, the control circuitry may analyze a specific parameter todetermine whether the parameter involves multiple advertisers. Thecontrol circuitry may iterate through each advertiser and create asub-parameter that mirrors the portion of the parameter associated withthe specific advertiser. The control circuitry may simulate thesplitting and, in response to successful splitting, make thedetermination that a specific parameter can be split.

The amount of content available to users in any given content deliverysystem can be substantial. Consequently, many users desire a form ofmedia guidance through an interface that allows users to efficientlynavigate content selections and easily identify content that they maydesire. An application that provides such guidance is referred to hereinas an interactive media guidance application or, sometimes, a mediaguidance application or a guidance application.

Interactive media guidance applications may take various forms dependingon the content for which they provide guidance. One typical type ofmedia guidance application is an interactive television program guide.Interactive television program guides (sometimes referred to aselectronic program guides) are well-known guidance applications that,among other things, allow users to navigate among and locate many typesof content or media assets. Interactive media guidance applications maygenerate graphical user interface screens that enable a user to navigateamong, locate and select content. As referred to herein, the terms“media asset” and “content” should be understood to mean anelectronically consumable user asset, such as television programming, aswell as pay-per-view programs, on-demand programs (as in video-on-demand(VOD) systems), Internet content (e.g., streaming content, downloadablecontent, Webcasts, etc.), video clips, audio, content information,pictures, rotating images, documents, playlists, websites, articles,books, electronic books, blogs, advertisements, chat sessions, socialmedia, applications, games, and/or any other media or multimedia and/orcombination of the same. Guidance applications also allow users tonavigate among and locate content. As referred to herein, the term“multimedia” should be understood to mean content that utilizes at leasttwo different content forms described above, for example, text, audio,images, video, or interactivity content forms. Content may be recorded,played, displayed or accessed by user equipment devices, but can also bepart of a live performance.

The media guidance application and/or any instructions for performingany of the embodiments discussed herein may be encoded on computerreadable media. Computer readable media includes any media capable ofstoring data. The computer readable media may be transitory, including,but not limited to, propagating electrical or electromagnetic signals,or may be non-transitory including, but not limited to, volatile andnon-volatile computer memory or storage devices such as a hard disk,floppy disk, USB drive, DVD, CD, media cards, register memory, processorcaches, Random Access Memory (“RAM”), etc.

With the advent of the Internet, mobile computing, and high-speedwireless networks, users are accessing media on user equipment deviceson which they traditionally did not. As referred to herein, the phrase“user equipment device,” “user equipment,” “user device,” “electronicdevice,” “electronic equipment,” “media equipment device,” or “mediadevice” should be understood to mean any device for accessing thecontent described above, such as a television, a Smart TV, a set-topbox, an integrated receiver decoder (IRD) for handling satellitetelevision, a digital storage device, a digital media receiver (DMR), adigital media adapter (DMA), a streaming media device, a DVD player, aDVD recorder, a connected DVD, a local media server, a BLU-RAY player, aBLU-RAY recorder, a personal computer (PC), a laptop computer, a tabletcomputer, a WebTV box, a personal computer television (PC/TV), a PCmedia server, a PC media center, a hand-held computer, a stationarytelephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile telephone, aportable video player, a portable music player, a portable gamingmachine, a smart phone, or any other television equipment, computingequipment, or wireless device, and/or combination of the same. In someembodiments, the user equipment device may have a front facing screenand a rear facing screen, multiple front screens, or multiple angledscreens. In some embodiments, the user equipment device may have a frontfacing camera and/or a rear facing camera. On these user equipmentdevices, users may be able to navigate among and locate the same contentavailable through a television. Consequently, media guidance may beavailable on these devices, as well. The guidance provided may be forcontent available only through a television, for content available onlythrough one or more of other types of user equipment devices, or forcontent available both through a television and one or more of the othertypes of user equipment devices. The media guidance applications may beprovided as on-line applications (i.e., provided on a web-site), or asstand-alone applications or clients on user equipment devices. Variousdevices and platforms that may implement media guidance applications aredescribed in more detail below.

One of the functions of the media guidance application is to providemedia guidance data to users. As referred to herein, the phrase “mediaguidance data” or “guidance data” should be understood to mean any datarelated to content or data used in operating the guidance application.For example, the guidance data may include program information, guidanceapplication settings, user preferences, user profile information, medialistings, media-related information (e.g., broadcast times, broadcastchannels, titles, descriptions, ratings information (e.g., parentalcontrol ratings, critic's ratings, etc.), genre or category information,actor information, logo data for broadcasters' or providers' logos,etc.), media format (e.g., standard definition, high definition, 3D,etc.), advertisement information (e.g., text, images, media clips,etc.), on-demand information, blogs, websites, and any other type ofguidance data that is helpful for a user to navigate among and locatedesired content selections.

FIGS. 2-3 show illustrative display screens that may be used to providemedia guidance data. The display screens shown in FIGS. 2-3 may beimplemented on any suitable user equipment device or platform. While thedisplays of FIGS. 2-3 are illustrated as full screen displays, they mayalso be fully or partially overlaid over content being displayed. A usermay indicate a desire to access content information by selecting aselectable option provided in a display screen (e.g., a menu option, alistings option, an icon, a hyperlink, etc.) or pressing a dedicatedbutton (e.g., a GUIDE button) on a remote control or other user inputinterface or device. In response to the user's indication, the mediaguidance application may provide a display screen with media guidancedata organized in one of several ways, such as by time and channel in agrid, by time, by channel, by source, by content type, by category(e.g., movies, sports, news, children, or other categories ofprogramming), or other predefined, user-defined, or other organizationcriteria.

FIG. 2 shows illustrative grid of a program listings display 200arranged by time and channel that also enables access to different typesof content in a single display. Display 200 may include grid 202 with:(1) a column of channel/content type identifiers 204, where eachchannel/content type identifier (which is a cell in the column)identifies a different channel or content type available; and (2) a rowof time identifiers 206, where each time identifier (which is a cell inthe row) identifies a time block of programming. Grid 202 also includescells of program listings, such as program listing 208, where eachlisting provides the title of the program provided on the listing'sassociated channel and time. With a user input device, a user can selectprogram listings by moving highlight region 210. Information relating tothe program listing selected by highlight region 210 may be provided inprogram information region 212. Region 212 may include, for example, theprogram title, the program description, the time the program is provided(if applicable), the channel the program is on (if applicable), theprogram's rating, and other desired information.

In addition to providing access to linear programming (e.g., contentthat is scheduled to be transmitted to a plurality of user equipmentdevices at a predetermined time and is provided according to aschedule), the media guidance application also provides access tonon-linear programming (e.g., content accessible to a user equipmentdevice at any time and is not provided according to a schedule).Non-linear programming may include content from different contentsources including on-demand content (e.g., VOD), Internet content (e.g.,streaming media, downloadable media, etc.), locally stored content(e.g., content stored on any user equipment device described above orother storage device), or other time-independent content. On-demandcontent may include movies or any other content provided by a particularcontent provider (e.g., HBO On Demand providing “The Sopranos” and “CurbYour Enthusiasm”). HBO ON DEMAND is a service mark owned by Time WarnerCompany L.P. et al. and THE SOPRANOS and CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM aretrademarks owned by the Home Box Office, Inc. Internet content mayinclude web events, such as a chat session or Webcast, or contentavailable on-demand as streaming content or downloadable content throughan Internet web site or other Internet access (e.g. FTP).

Grid 202 may provide media guidance data for non-linear programmingincluding on-demand listing 214, recorded content listing 216, andInternet content listing 218. A display combining media guidance datafor content from different types of content sources is sometimesreferred to as a “mixed-media” display. Various permutations of thetypes of media guidance data that may be displayed that are differentthan display 200 may be based on user selection or guidance applicationdefinition (e.g., a display of only recorded and broadcast listings,only on-demand and broadcast listings, etc.). As illustrated, listings214, 216, and 218 are shown as spanning the entire time block displayedin grid 202 to indicate that selection of these listings may provideaccess to a display dedicated to on-demand listings, recorded listings,or Internet listings, respectively. In some embodiments, listings forthese content types may be included directly in grid 202. Additionalmedia guidance data may be displayed in response to the user selectingone of the navigational icons 220. (Pressing an arrow key on a userinput device may affect the display in a similar manner as selectingnavigational icons 220.)

Display 200 may also include video region 222, advertisement 224, andoptions region 226. Video region 222 may allow the user to view and/orpreview programs that are currently available, will be available, orwere available to the user. The content of video region 222 maycorrespond to, or be independent from, one of the listings displayed ingrid 202. Grid displays including a video region are sometimes referredto as picture-in-guide (PIG) displays. PIG displays and theirfunctionalities are described in greater detail in Satterfield et al.U.S. Pat. No. 6,564,378, issued May 13, 2003 and Yuen et al. U.S. Pat.No. 6,239,794, issued May 29, 2001, which are hereby incorporated byreference herein in their entireties. PIG displays may be included inother media guidance application display screens of the embodimentsdescribed herein.

Advertisement 224 may provide an advertisement for content that,depending on a viewer's access rights (e.g., for subscriptionprogramming), is currently available for viewing, will be available forviewing in the future, or may never become available for viewing, andmay correspond to or be unrelated to one or more of the content listingsin grid 202. Advertisement 224 may also be for products or servicesrelated or unrelated to the content displayed in grid 202. Advertisement224 may be selectable and provide further information about content,provide information about a product or a service, enable purchasing ofcontent, a product, or a service, provide content relating to theadvertisement, etc. Advertisement 224 may be targeted based on a user'sprofile/preferences, monitored user activity, the type of displayprovided, or on other suitable targeted advertisement bases.

While advertisement 224 is shown as rectangular or banner shaped,advertisements may be provided in any suitable size, shape, and locationin a guidance application display. For example, advertisement 224 may beprovided as a rectangular shape that is horizontally adjacent to grid202. This is sometimes referred to as a panel advertisement. Inaddition, advertisements may be overlaid over content or a guidanceapplication display or embedded within a display. Advertisements mayalso include text, images, rotating images, video clips, or other typesof content described above. Advertisements may be stored in a userequipment device having a guidance application, in a database connectedto the user equipment, in a remote location (including streaming mediaservers), or on other storage means, or a combination of theselocations. Providing advertisements in a media guidance application isdiscussed in greater detail in, for example, Knudson et al., U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2003/0110499, filed Jan. 17, 2003; Ward, IIIet al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,756,997, issued Jun. 29, 2004; and Schein et al.U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,714, issued May 14, 2002, which are herebyincorporated by reference herein in their entireties. It will beappreciated that advertisements may be included in other media guidanceapplication display screens of the embodiments described herein.

In some embodiments, advertisement 224 may be provided by theadvertisement assignment application. The advertisement assignmentapplication may determine, based on the above-described actions, that aspecific advertisement during a specific advertisement slot should bedisplayed as advertisement 224. In some embodiments, the advertisementassignment application may reside on advertisement source 524. Theadvertisement assignment application may transmit advertisement 224 fromthe advertisement source 524 to a user device (e.g., user device 502,504, or 506).

Options region 226 may allow the user to access different types ofcontent, media guidance application displays, and/or media guidanceapplication features. Options region 226 may be part of display 200 (andother display screens described herein), or may be invoked by a user byselecting an on-screen option or pressing a dedicated or assignablebutton on a user input device. The selectable options within optionsregion 226 may concern features related to program listings in grid 202or may include options available from a main menu display. Featuresrelated to program listings may include searching for other air times orways of receiving a program, recording a program, enabling seriesrecording of a program, setting program and/or channel as a favorite,purchasing a program, or other features. Options available from a mainmenu display may include search options, VOD options, parental controloptions, Internet options, cloud-based options, device synchronizationoptions, second screen device options, options to access various typesof media guidance data displays, options to subscribe to a premiumservice, options to edit a user's profile, options to access a browseoverlay, or other options.

The media guidance application may be personalized based on a user'spreferences. A personalized media guidance application allows a user tocustomize displays and features to create a personalized “experience”with the media guidance application. This personalized experience may becreated by allowing a user to input these customizations and/or by themedia guidance application monitoring user activity to determine varioususer preferences. Users may access their personalized guidanceapplication by logging in or otherwise identifying themselves to theguidance application. Customization of the media guidance applicationmay be made in accordance with a user profile. The customizations mayinclude varying presentation schemes (e.g., color scheme of displays,font size of text, etc.), aspects of content listings displayed (e.g.,only HDTV or only 3D programming, user-specified broadcast channelsbased on favorite channel selections, re-ordering the display ofchannels, recommended content, etc.), desired recording features (e.g.,recording or series recordings for particular users, recording quality,etc.), parental control settings, customized presentation of Internetcontent (e.g., presentation of social media content, e-mail,electronically delivered articles, etc.) and other desiredcustomizations.

The media guidance application may allow a user to provide user profileinformation or may automatically compile user profile information. Themedia guidance application may, for example, monitor the content theuser accesses and/or other interactions the user may have with theguidance application. Additionally, the media guidance application mayobtain all or part of other user profiles that are related to aparticular user (e.g., from other web sites on the Internet the useraccesses, such as www.tivo.com, from other media guidance applicationsthe user accesses, from other interactive applications the useraccesses, from another user equipment device of the user, etc.), and/orobtain information about the user from other sources that the mediaguidance application may access. As a result, a user can be providedwith a unified guidance application experience across the user'sdifferent user equipment devices. This type of user experience isdescribed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 5. Additionalpersonalized media guidance application features are described ingreater detail in Ellis et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2005/0251827, filed Jul. 11, 2005, Boyer et al., U.S. Pat. No.7,165,098, issued Jan. 16, 2007, and Ellis et al., U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2002/0174430, filed Feb. 21, 2002, which arehereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

Another display arrangement for providing media guidance is shown inFIG. 3. Video mosaic display 300 includes selectable options 302 forcontent information organized based on content type, genre, and/or otherorganization criteria. In display 300, television listings option 304 isselected, thus providing listings 306, 308, 310, and 312 as broadcastprogram listings. In display 300 the listings may provide graphicalimages including cover art, still images from the content, video clippreviews, live video from the content, or other types of content thatindicate to a user the content being described by the media guidancedata in the listing. Each of the graphical listings may also beaccompanied by text to provide further information about the contentassociated with the listing. For example, listing 308 may include morethan one portion, including media portion 314 and text portion 316.Media portion 314 and/or text portion 316 may be selectable to viewcontent in full-screen or to view information related to the contentdisplayed in media portion 314 (e.g., to view listings for the channelthat the video is displayed on).

The listings in display 300 are of different sizes (i.e., listing 306 islarger than listings 308, 310, and 312), but if desired, all thelistings may be the same size. Listings may be of different sizes orgraphically accentuated to indicate degrees of interest to the user orto emphasize certain content, as desired by the content provider orbased on user preferences. Various systems and methods for graphicallyaccentuating content listings are discussed in, for example, Yates, U.S.Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0153885, filed Nov. 12, 2009,which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Users may access content and the media guidance application (and itsdisplay screens described above and below) from one or more of theiruser equipment devices. FIG. 4 shows a generalized embodiment ofillustrative user equipment device 400. More specific implementations ofuser equipment devices are discussed below in connection with FIG. 5.User equipment device 400 may receive content and data via input/output(hereinafter “I/O”) path 402. I/O path 402 may provide content (e.g.,broadcast programming, on-demand programming, Internet content, contentavailable over a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN),and/or other content) and data to control circuitry 404, which includesprocessing circuitry 406 and storage 408. Control circuitry 404 may beused to send and receive commands, requests, and other suitable datausing I/O path 402. I/O path 402 may connect control circuitry 404 (andspecifically processing circuitry 406) to one or more communicationspaths (described below). I/O functions may be provided by one or more ofthese communications paths, but are shown as a single path in FIG. 4 toavoid overcomplicating the drawing.

Control circuitry 404 may be based on any suitable processing circuitrysuch as processing circuitry 406. As referred to herein, processingcircuitry should be understood to mean circuitry based on one or moremicroprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors,programmable logic devices, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs),application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), etc., and may includea multi-core processor (e.g., dual-core, quad-core, hexa-core, or anysuitable number of cores) or supercomputer. In some embodiments,processing circuitry may be distributed across multiple separateprocessors or processing units, for example, multiple of the same typeof processing units (e.g., two Intel Core i7 processors) or multipledifferent processors (e.g., an Intel Core i5 processor and an Intel Corei7 processor). In some embodiments, control circuitry 404 executesinstructions for a media guidance application stored in memory (i.e.,storage 408). Specifically, control circuitry 404 may be instructed bythe media guidance application to perform the functions discussed aboveand below. For example, the media guidance application may provideinstructions to control circuitry 404 to generate the media guidancedisplays. In some implementations, any action performed by controlcircuitry 404 may be based on instructions received from the mediaguidance application.

In client-server based embodiments, control circuitry 404 may includecommunications circuitry suitable for communicating with a guidanceapplication server or other networks or servers. The instructions forcarrying out the above mentioned functionality may be stored on theguidance application server. Communications circuitry may include acable modem, an integrated services digital network (ISDN) modem, adigital subscriber line (DSL) modem, a telephone modem, Ethernet card,or a wireless modem for communications with other equipment, or anyother suitable communications circuitry. Such communications may involvethe Internet or any other suitable communications networks or paths(which is described in more detail in connection with FIG. 5). Inaddition, communications circuitry may include circuitry that enablespeer-to-peer communication of user equipment devices, or communicationof user equipment devices in locations remote from each other (describedin more detail below).

Memory may be an electronic storage device provided as storage 408 thatis part of control circuitry 404. As referred to herein, the phrase“electronic storage device” or “storage device” should be understood tomean any device for storing electronic data, computer software, orfirmware, such as random-access memory, read-only memory, hard drives,optical drives, digital video disc (DVD) recorders, compact disc (CD)recorders, BLU-RAY disc (BD) recorders, BLU-RAY 3D disc recorders,digital video recorders (DVR, sometimes called a personal videorecorder, or PVR), solid state devices, quantum storage devices, gamingconsoles, gaming media, or any other suitable fixed or removable storagedevices, and/or any combination of the same. Storage 408 may be used tostore various types of content described herein as well as mediaguidance data described above. Nonvolatile memory may also be used(e.g., to launch a boot-up routine and other instructions). Cloud-basedstorage, described in relation to FIG. 5, may be used to supplementstorage 408 or instead of storage 408.

Control circuitry 404 may include video generating circuitry and tuningcircuitry, such as one or more analog tuners, one or more MPEG-2decoders or other digital decoding circuitry, high-definition tuners, orany other suitable tuning or video circuits or combinations of suchcircuits. Encoding circuitry (e.g., for converting over-the-air, analog,or digital signals to MPEG signals for storage) may also be provided.Control circuitry 404 may also include scaler circuitry for upconvertingand downconverting content into the preferred output format of the userequipment 400. Circuitry 404 may also include digital-to-analogconverter circuitry and analog-to-digital converter circuitry forconverting between digital and analog signals. The tuning and encodingcircuitry may be used by the user equipment device to receive and todisplay, to play, or to record content. The tuning and encodingcircuitry may also be used to receive guidance data. The circuitrydescribed herein, including for example, the tuning, video generating,encoding, decoding, encrypting, decrypting, scaler, and analog/digitalcircuitry, may be implemented using software running on one or moregeneral purpose or specialized processors. Multiple tuners may beprovided to handle simultaneous tuning functions (e.g., watch and recordfunctions, picture-in-picture (PIP) functions, multiple-tuner recording,etc.). If storage 408 is provided as a separate device from userequipment 400, the tuning and encoding circuitry (including multipletuners) may be associated with storage 408.

A user may send instructions to control circuitry 404 using user inputinterface 410. User input interface 410 may be any suitable userinterface, such as a remote control, mouse, trackball, keypad, keyboard,touch screen, touchpad, stylus input, joystick, voice recognitioninterface, or other user input interfaces. Display 412 may be providedas a stand-alone device or integrated with other elements of userequipment device 400. For example, display 412 may be a touchscreen ortouch-sensitive display. In such circumstances, user input interface 410may be integrated with or combined with display 412. Display 412 may beone or more of a monitor, a television, a liquid crystal display (LCD)for a mobile device, amorphous silicon display, low temperature polysilicon display, electronic ink display, electrophoretic display, activematrix display, electro-wetting display, electrofluidic display, cathoderay tube display, light-emitting diode display, electroluminescentdisplay, plasma display panel, high-performance addressing display,thin-film transistor display, organic light-emitting diode display,surface-conduction electron-emitter display (SED), laser television,carbon nanotubes, quantum dot display, interferometric modulatordisplay, or any other suitable equipment for displaying visual images.In some embodiments, display 412 may be HDTV-capable. In someembodiments, display 412 may be a 3D display, and the interactive mediaguidance application and any suitable content may be displayed in 3D. Avideo card or graphics card may generate the output to the display 412.The video card may offer various functions such as accelerated renderingof 3D scenes and 2D graphics, MPEG-2/MPEG-4 decoding, TV output, or theability to connect multiple monitors. The video card may be anyprocessing circuitry described above in relation to control circuitry404. The video card may be integrated with the control circuitry 404.Speakers 414 may be provided as integrated with other elements of userequipment device 400 or may be stand-alone units. The audio component ofvideos and other content displayed on display 412 may be played throughspeakers 414. In some embodiments, the audio may be distributed to areceiver (not shown), which processes and outputs the audio via speakers414.

The guidance application may be implemented using any suitablearchitecture. For example, it may be a stand-alone applicationwholly-implemented on user equipment device 400. In such an approach,instructions of the application are stored locally (e.g., in storage408), and data for use by the application is downloaded on a periodicbasis (e.g., from an out-of-band feed, from an Internet resource, orusing another suitable approach). Control circuitry 404 may retrieveinstructions of the application from storage 408 and process theinstructions to generate any of the displays discussed herein. Based onthe processed instructions, control circuitry 404 may determine whataction to perform when input is received from input interface 410. Forexample, movement of a cursor on a display up/down may be indicated bythe processed instructions when input interface 410 indicates that anup/down button was selected.

In some embodiments, the media guidance application is a client-serverbased application. Data for use by a thick or thin client implemented onuser equipment device 400 is retrieved on-demand by issuing requests toa server remote to the user equipment device 400. In one example of aclient-server based guidance application, control circuitry 404 runs aweb browser that interprets web pages provided by a remote server. Forexample, the remote server may store the instructions for theapplication in a storage device. The remote server may process thestored instructions using circuitry (e.g., control circuitry 404) andgenerate the displays discussed above and below. The client device mayreceive the displays generated by the remote server and may display thecontent of the displays locally on equipment device 400. This way, theprocessing of the instructions is performed remotely by the server whilethe resulting displays are provided locally on equipment device 400.Equipment device 400 may receive inputs from the user via inputinterface 410 and transmit those inputs to the remote server forprocessing and generating the corresponding displays. For example,equipment device 400 may transmit a communication to the remote serverindicating that an up/down button was selected via input interface 410.The remote server may process instructions in accordance with that inputand generate a display of the application corresponding to the input(e.g., a display that moves a cursor up/down). The generated display isthen transmitted to equipment device 400 for presentation to the user.

In some embodiments, the media guidance application is downloaded andinterpreted or otherwise run by an interpreter or virtual machine (runby control circuitry 404). In some embodiments, the guidance applicationmay be encoded in the ETV Binary Interchange Format (EBIF), received bycontrol circuitry 404 as part of a suitable feed, and interpreted by auser agent running on control circuitry 404. For example, the guidanceapplication may be an EBIF application. In some embodiments, theguidance application may be defined by a series of JAVA-based files thatare received and run by a local virtual machine or other suitablemiddleware executed by control circuitry 404. In some of suchembodiments (e.g., those employing MPEG-2 or other digital mediaencoding schemes), the guidance application may be, for example, encodedand transmitted in an MPEG-2 object carousel with the MPEG audio andvideo packets of a program.

User equipment device 400 of FIG. 4 can be implemented in system 500 ofFIG. 5 as user television equipment 502, user computer equipment 504,wireless user communications device 506, or any other type of userequipment suitable for accessing content, such as a non-portable gamingmachine. For simplicity, these devices may be referred to hereincollectively as user equipment or user equipment devices, and may besubstantially similar to user equipment devices described above. Userequipment devices, on which a media guidance application may beimplemented, may function as a standalone device or may be part of anetwork of devices. Various network configurations of devices may beimplemented and are discussed in more detail below.

A user equipment device utilizing at least some of the system featuresdescribed above in connection with FIG. 4 may not be classified solelyas user television equipment 502, user computer equipment 504, or awireless user communications device 506. For example, user televisionequipment 502 may, like some user computer equipment 504, beInternet-enabled allowing for access to Internet content, while usercomputer equipment 504 may, like some user television equipment 502,include a tuner allowing for access to television programming. The mediaguidance application may have the same layout on various different typesof user equipment or may be tailored to the display capabilities of theuser equipment. For example, on user computer equipment 504, theguidance application may be provided as a web site accessed by a webbrowser. In another example, the guidance application may be scaled downfor wireless user communications devices 506.

In system 500, there is typically more than one of each type of userequipment device but only one of each is shown in FIG. 5 to avoidovercomplicating the drawing. In addition, each user may utilize morethan one type of user equipment device and also more than one of eachtype of user equipment device.

In some embodiments, a user equipment device (e.g., user televisionequipment 502, user computer equipment 504, wireless user communicationsdevice 506) may be referred to as a “second screen device.” For example,a second screen device may supplement content presented on a first userequipment device. The content presented on the second screen device maybe any suitable content that supplements the content presented on thefirst device. In some embodiments, the second screen device provides aninterface for adjusting settings and display preferences of the firstdevice. In some embodiments, the second screen device is configured forinteracting with other second screen devices or for interacting with asocial network. The second screen device can be located in the same roomas the first device, a different room from the first device but in thesame house or building, or in a different building from the firstdevice.

The user may also set various settings to maintain consistent mediaguidance application settings across in-home devices and remote devices.Settings include those described herein, as well as channel and programfavorites, programming preferences that the guidance applicationutilizes to make programming recommendations, display preferences, andother desirable guidance settings. For example, if a user sets a channelas a favorite on, for example, the web site www.tivo.com on theirpersonal computer at their office, the same channel would appear as afavorite on the user's in-home devices (e.g., user television equipmentand user computer equipment) as well as the user's mobile devices, ifdesired. Therefore, changes made on one user equipment device can changethe guidance experience on another user equipment device, regardless ofwhether they are the same or a different type of user equipment device.In addition, the changes made may be based on settings input by a user,as well as user activity monitored by the guidance application.

The user equipment devices may be coupled to communications network 514.Namely, user television equipment 502, user computer equipment 504, andwireless user communications device 506 are coupled to communicationsnetwork 514 via communications paths 508, 510, and 512, respectively.Communications network 514 may be one or more networks including theInternet, a mobile phone network, mobile voice or data network (e.g., a4G or LTE network), cable network, public switched telephone network, orother types of communications network or combinations of communicationsnetworks. Paths 508, 510, and 512 may separately or together include oneor more communications paths, such as, a satellite path, a fiber-opticpath, a cable path, a path that supports Internet communications (e.g.,IPTV), free-space connections (e.g., for broadcast or other wirelesssignals), or any other suitable wired or wireless communications path orcombination of such paths. Path 512 is drawn with dotted lines toindicate that in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 5 it is awireless path and paths 508 and 510 are drawn as solid lines to indicatethey are wired paths (although these paths may be wireless paths, ifdesired). Communications with the user equipment devices may be providedby one or more of these communications paths, but are shown as a singlepath in FIG. 5 to avoid overcomplicating the drawing.

Although communications paths are not drawn between user equipmentdevices, these devices may communicate directly with each other viacommunication paths, such as those described above in connection withpaths 508, 510, and 512, as well as other short-range point-to-pointcommunication paths, such as USB cables, IEEE 1394 cables, wirelesspaths (e.g., Bluetooth, infrared, IEEE 802-11x, etc.), or othershort-range communication via wired or wireless paths. BLUETOOTH is acertification mark owned by Bluetooth SIG, INC. The user equipmentdevices may also communicate with each other directly through anindirect path via communications network 514.

System 500 includes content source 516 and media guidance data source518 coupled to communications network 514 via communication paths 520and 522, respectively. Paths 520 and 522 may include any of thecommunication paths described above in connection with paths 508, 510,and 512. Communications with the content source 516 and media guidancedata source 518 may be exchanged over one or more communications paths,but are shown as a single path in FIG. 5 to avoid overcomplicating thedrawing. In addition, there may be more than one of each of contentsource 516 and media guidance data source 518, but only one of each isshown in FIG. 5 to avoid overcomplicating the drawing. (The differenttypes of each of these sources are discussed below.) If desired, contentsource 516 and media guidance data source 518 may be integrated as onesource device. Although communications between sources 516 and 518 withuser equipment devices 502, 504, and 506 are shown as throughcommunications network 514, in some embodiments, sources 516 and 518 maycommunicate directly with user equipment devices 502, 504, and 506 viacommunication paths (not shown) such as those described above inconnection with paths 508, 510, and 512.

System 500 may also include an advertisement source 524 coupled tocommunications network 514 via a communications path 526. Path 526 mayinclude any of the communication paths described above in connectionwith paths 508, 510, and 512. Advertisement source 524 may include anadvertisement assignment application that may transmit advertisements tospecific users and under specific circumstances. For example, a cableoperator may have the right to insert advertisements during specifictime slots on specific channels. Thus, advertisement source 524 maytransmit advertisements to users during those time slots.

Content source 516 may include one or more types of content distributionequipment including a television distribution facility, cable systemheadend, satellite distribution facility, programming sources (e.g.,television broadcasters, such as NBC, ABC, HBO, etc.), intermediatedistribution facilities and/or servers, Internet providers, on-demandmedia servers, and other content providers. NBC is a trademark owned bythe National Broadcasting Company, Inc., ABC is a trademark owned by theAmerican Broadcasting Company, Inc., and HBO is a trademark owned by theHome Box Office, Inc. Content source 516 may be the originator ofcontent (e.g., a television broadcaster, a Webcast provider, etc.) ormay not be the originator of content (e.g., an on-demand contentprovider, an Internet provider of content of broadcast programs fordownloading, etc.). Content source 516 may include cable sources,satellite providers, on-demand providers, Internet providers,over-the-top content providers, or other providers of content. Contentsource 516 may also include a remote media server used to storedifferent types of content (including video content selected by a user),in a location remote from any of the user equipment devices. Systems andmethods for remote storage of content, and providing remotely storedcontent to user equipment are discussed in greater detail in connectionwith Ellis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,761,892, issued Jul. 20, 2010, whichis hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Media guidance data source 518 may provide media guidance data, such asthe media guidance data described above. Media guidance data may beprovided to the user equipment devices using any suitable approach. Insome embodiments, the guidance application may be a stand-aloneinteractive television program guide that receives program guide datavia a data feed (e.g., a continuous feed or trickle feed). Programschedule data and other guidance data may be provided to the userequipment on a television channel sideband, using an in-band digitalsignal, using an out-of-band digital signal, or by any other suitabledata transmission technique. Program schedule data and other mediaguidance data may be provided to user equipment on multiple analog ordigital television channels.

In some embodiments, guidance data from media guidance data source 518may be provided to users' equipment using a client-server approach. Forexample, a user equipment device may pull media guidance data from aserver, or a server may push media guidance data to a user equipmentdevice. In some embodiments, a guidance application client residing onthe user's equipment may initiate sessions with source 518 to obtainguidance data when needed, e.g., when the guidance data is out of dateor when the user equipment device receives a request from the user toreceive data. Media guidance may be provided to the user equipment withany suitable frequency (e.g., continuously, daily, a user-specifiedperiod of time, a system-specified period of time, in response to arequest from user equipment, etc.). Media guidance data source 518 mayprovide user equipment devices 502, 504, and 506 the media guidanceapplication itself or software updates for the media guidanceapplication.

In some embodiments, the media guidance data may include viewer data.For example, the viewer data may include current and/or historical useractivity information (e.g., what content the user typically watches,what times of day the user watches content, whether the user interactswith a social network, at what times the user interacts with a socialnetwork to post information, what types of content the user typicallywatches (e.g., pay TV or free TV), mood, brain activity information,etc.). The media guidance data may also include subscription data. Forexample, the subscription data may identify to which sources or servicesa given user subscribes and/or to which sources or services the givenuser has previously subscribed but later terminated access (e.g.,whether the user subscribes to premium channels, whether the user hasadded a premium level of services, whether the user has increasedInternet speed). In some embodiments, the viewer data and/or thesubscription data may identify patterns of a given user for a period ofmore than one year. The media guidance data may include a model (e.g., asurvivor model) used for generating a score that indicates a likelihooda given user will terminate access to a service/source. For example, themedia guidance application may process the viewer data with thesubscription data using the model to generate a value or score thatindicates a likelihood of whether the given user will terminate accessto a particular service or source. In particular, a higher score mayindicate a higher level of confidence that the user will terminateaccess to a particular service or source. Based on the score, the mediaguidance application may generate promotions and advertisements thatentice the user to keep the particular service or source indicated bythe score as one to which the user will likely terminate access.

Media guidance applications may be, for example, stand-aloneapplications implemented on user equipment devices. For example, themedia guidance application may be implemented as software or a set ofexecutable instructions which may be stored in storage 408, and executedby control circuitry 404 of a user equipment device 400. In someembodiments, media guidance applications may be client-serverapplications where only a client application resides on the userequipment device, and server application resides on a remote server. Forexample, media guidance applications may be implemented partially as aclient application on control circuitry 404 of user equipment device 400and partially on a remote server as a server application (e.g., mediaguidance data source 518) running on control circuitry of the remoteserver. When executed by control circuitry of the remote server (such asmedia guidance data source 518), the media guidance application mayinstruct the control circuitry to generate the guidance applicationdisplays and transmit the generated displays to the user equipmentdevices. The server application may instruct the control circuitry ofthe media guidance data source 518 to transmit data for storage on theuser equipment. The client application may instruct control circuitry ofthe receiving user equipment to generate the guidance applicationdisplays.

Content and/or media guidance data delivered to user equipment devices502, 504, and 506 may be over-the-top (OTT) content. OTT contentdelivery allows Internet-enabled user devices, including any userequipment device described above, to receive content that is transferredover the Internet, including any content described above, in addition tocontent received over cable or satellite connections. OTT content isdelivered via an Internet connection provided by an Internet serviceprovider (ISP), but a third party distributes the content. The ISP maynot be responsible for the viewing abilities, copyrights, orredistribution of the content, and may only transfer IP packets providedby the OTT content provider. Examples of OTT content providers includeYOUTUBE, NETFLIX, and HULU, which provide audio and video via IPpackets. Youtube is a trademark owned by Google Inc., Netflix is atrademark owned by Netflix Inc., and Hulu is a trademark owned by Hulu,LLC. OTT content providers may additionally or alternatively providemedia guidance data described above. In addition to content and/or mediaguidance data, providers of OTT content can distribute media guidanceapplications (e.g., web-based applications or cloud-based applications),or the content can be displayed by media guidance applications stored onthe user equipment device.

Media guidance system 500 is intended to illustrate a number ofapproaches, or network configurations, by which user equipment devicesand sources of content and guidance data may communicate with each otherfor the purpose of accessing content and providing media guidance. Theembodiments described herein may be applied in any one or a subset ofthese approaches, or in a system employing other approaches fordelivering content and providing media guidance. The following fourapproaches provide specific illustrations of the generalized example ofFIG. 5.

In one approach, user equipment devices may communicate with each otherwithin a home network. User equipment devices can communicate with eachother directly via short-range point-to-point communication schemesdescribed above, via indirect paths through a hub or other similardevice provided on a home network, or via communications network 514.Each of the multiple individuals in a single home may operate differentuser equipment devices on the home network. As a result, it may bedesirable for various media guidance information or settings to becommunicated between the different user equipment devices. For example,it may be desirable for users to maintain consistent media guidanceapplication settings on different user equipment devices within a homenetwork, as described in greater detail in Ellis et al., U.S. PatentPublication No. 2005/0251827, filed Jul. 11, 2005. Different types ofuser equipment devices in a home network may also communicate with eachother to transmit content. For example, a user may transmit content fromuser computer equipment to a portable video player or portable musicplayer.

In a second approach, users may have multiple types of user equipment bywhich they access content and obtain media guidance. For example, someusers may have home networks that are accessed by in-home and mobiledevices. Users may control in-home devices via a media guidanceapplication implemented on a remote device. For example, users mayaccess an online media guidance application on a website via a personalcomputer at their office, or a mobile device such as a PDA orweb-enabled mobile telephone. The user may set various settings (e.g.,recordings, reminders, or other settings) on the online guidanceapplication to control the user's in-home equipment. The online guidemay control the user's equipment directly, or by communicating with amedia guidance application on the user's in-home equipment. Varioussystems and methods for user equipment devices communicating, where theuser equipment devices are in locations remote from each other, isdiscussed in, for example, Ellis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,046,801, issuedOct. 25, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety.

In a third approach, users of user equipment devices inside and outsidea home can use their media guidance application to communicate directlywith content source 516 to access content. Specifically, within a home,users of user television equipment 502 and user computer equipment 504may access the media guidance application to navigate among and locatedesirable content. Users may also access the media guidance applicationoutside of the home using wireless user communications devices 506 tonavigate among and locate desirable content.

In a fourth approach, user equipment devices may operate in a cloudcomputing environment to access cloud services. In a cloud computingenvironment, various types of computing services for content sharing,storage or distribution (e.g., video sharing sites or social networkingsites) are provided by a collection of network-accessible computing andstorage resources, referred to as “the cloud.” For example, the cloudcan include a collection of server computing devices, which may belocated centrally or at distributed locations, that provide cloud-basedservices to various types of users and devices connected via a networksuch as the Internet via communications network 514. These cloudresources may include one or more content sources 516 and one or moremedia guidance data sources 518. In addition or in the alternative, theremote computing sites may include other user equipment devices, such asuser television equipment 502, user computer equipment 504, and wirelessuser communications device 506. For example, the other user equipmentdevices may provide access to a stored copy of a video or a streamedvideo. In such embodiments, user equipment devices may operate in apeer-to-peer manner without communicating with a central server.

The cloud provides access to services, such as content storage, contentsharing, or social networking services, among other examples, as well asaccess to any content described above, for user equipment devices.Services can be provided in the cloud through cloud computing serviceproviders, or through other providers of online services. For example,the cloud-based services can include a content storage service, acontent sharing site, a social networking site, or other services viawhich user-sourced content is distributed for viewing by others onconnected devices. These cloud-based services may allow a user equipmentdevice to store content to the cloud and to receive content from thecloud rather than storing content locally and accessing locally-storedcontent.

A user may use various content capture devices, such as camcorders,digital cameras with video mode, audio recorders, mobile phones, andhandheld computing devices, to record content. The user can uploadcontent to a content storage service on the cloud either directly, forexample, from user computer equipment 504 or wireless usercommunications device 506 having content capture feature. Alternatively,the user can first transfer the content to a user equipment device, suchas user computer equipment 504. The user equipment device storing thecontent uploads the content to the cloud using a data transmissionservice on communications network 514. In some embodiments, the userequipment device itself is a cloud resource, and other user equipmentdevices can access the content directly from the user equipment deviceon which the user stored the content.

Cloud resources may be accessed by a user equipment device using, forexample, a web browser, a media guidance application, a desktopapplication, a mobile application, and/or any combination of accessapplications of the same. The user equipment device may be a cloudclient that relies on cloud computing for application delivery, or theuser equipment device may have some functionality without access tocloud resources. For example, some applications running on the userequipment device may be cloud applications, i.e., applications deliveredas a service over the Internet, while other applications may be storedand run on the user equipment device. In some embodiments, a user devicemay receive content from multiple cloud resources simultaneously. Forexample, a user device can stream audio from one cloud resource whiledownloading content from a second cloud resource. Or a user device candownload content from multiple cloud resources for more efficientdownloading. In some embodiments, user equipment devices can use cloudresources for processing operations such as the processing operationsperformed by processing circuitry described in relation to FIG. 4.

As referred herein, the term “in response to” refers to initiated as aresult of. For example, a first action being performed in response to asecond action may include interstitial steps between the first actionand the second action. As referred herein, the term “directly inresponse to” refers to caused by. For example, a first action beingperformed directly in response to a second action may not includeinterstitial steps between the first action and the second action.

FIG. 6 illustrates process 600 that may be used to resolve advertisementplacement conflicts. At 602, control circuitry 404 receives anadvertisement assignment model that includes a plurality of parametersthat define how a plurality of advertisements should be assigned to aplurality of advertisement slots. Control circuitry 404 may reside onany of user television equipment 502, user computer equipment 504, andwireless user communications device 506. In some embodiments, controlcircuitry 404 may reside on a server (e.g., a server associated withmedia content source 516, media guidance data source 518 and/oradvertisement source 524). Control circuitry 404 may receive theadvertisement model from user input interface 410. At 604, controlcircuitry 404 simulates an assignment of the plurality of advertisementsto the plurality of advertisement slots based on the plurality ofparameters. Control circuitry 404 may perform the simulation itself ormay transmit (e.g., through communications network 514) theadvertisement assignment model to a remote server (e.g., a serverassociated with media content source 516, media guidance data source518, or advertisement source 524).

At 606, control circuitry 404 determines, based on the simulating, thatthere is a conflict that prevents assigning the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots without violatinga parameter of the plurality of parameters. Control circuitry 404 maymake the determination by applying parameters to the advertisement slotsas described above. In some embodiments, control circuitry 404 mayreceive, from a remote server (e.g., a server located at media contentsource 516, media guidance data source 518, or advertisement source524), simulation results with data describing identified conflicts.

At 608, the control circuitry, in response to the determining, retrievesa respective parameter score for each parameter of the plurality ofparameters, where each parameter score indicates an importance of thecorresponding parameter. The control circuitry may retrieve theplurality of parameters from a database, as described above. Thedatabase may reside locally in storage 408 or on a remote server (e.g.,a server associated with media content source 516, media guidance datasource 518, or advertisement source 524). Control circuitry 404 mayretrieve the parameters by transmitting a query to the database, andreceive from the database the required information.

At 610, control circuitry 404 calculates a total parameter score for theadvertisement assignment model based on the retrieved parameter scores.For example, control circuitry 404 may calculate a mathematical sum ofall parameter scores. In some embodiments, the parameter scores may beweighted. In those embodiments, the control circuitry may calculate thetotal parameter score taking into account weights of each parameterscore.

At 612, control circuitry 404 selects at least one parameter to removefrom the advertisement assignment model taking the following actions. At614, control circuitry 404 determines at least one conflict parameterwhose removal from the advertisement assignment model causes theconflict to be resolved. Control circuitry 404 may execute a feasibilityrelaxation module to determine different combinations of parameters thatmay be removed from the advertisement assignment model in order toresolve the conflict. In some embodiments, control circuitry 404 maytransmit (e.g., over communications network 514) the advertisementassignment model to a remote server (e.g., a server associated withmedia content source 516, media guidance data source 518, oradvertisement source 524) in order to make the identification.

At 616, control circuitry 404 calculates a plurality of different totalparameter scores based on different configurations of the plurality ofparameters in the advertisement assignment model, where each calculateddifferent total parameter score is based on the removal, from theadvertisement assignment model, of different ones of the at least oneconflict parameter. The control circuitry may create a data structurefor each possible configuration and store the different parameters thathave not been removed from the configuration in the data structures. Thecontrol circuitry may calculate a sum, or, in some embodiments, aweighted sum, of all parameter scores. The data structure may residelocally (e.g., in storage 408) or at a remote server (e.g., a serverassociated with media content source 516, media guidance data source518, and/or advertisement source 524). At 618, control circuitry 404determines, based on the different total parameter scores, aconfiguration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations that minimizes a change to the total parameter score andminimizes a number of conflict parameters removed from the advertisementassignment model. The control circuitry may determine a sum that is theleast changed from the total parameter score and use the configurationassociated with that sum. If multiple configurations are determined,based on the sums, that are closest in value to the total parameterscore, the configuration that requires the least number of parameterremovals is selected.

At 620, control circuitry 404 modifies the advertisement assignmentmodel to remove the at least one conflict parameter from theadvertisement assignment model according to the configuration thatminimizes the change to the total parameter score and minimizes thenumber of conflict parameters removed from the advertisement assignmentmodel. For example, control circuitry 404 may select a data structurethat includes a configuration with the sum, or in some embodiments aweighted sum, closest in value to the total parameter score and replacesthe parameters in the advertisement assignment model with parameters inthe configuration data structure.

At 622, control circuitry 404 assigns the plurality of advertisements tothe plurality of advertisement slots based on the modified advertisementassignment model. Control circuitry 404 may perform the assignments in asimilar manner to performing the simulation, but instead actuallytransmit the assignment information to the advertisement system (e.g.,the advertisement system located at advertisement source 524).

FIG. 7 depicts an illustrative process for determining whetherparameters of the advertisement assignment model cause a conflict, inaccordance with some embodiments of this disclosure. At 702, controlcircuitry 404 receives a plurality of parameters, a plurality ofadvertisement slot identifiers, and a plurality of advertisementidentifiers. The control circuitry may receive (e.g., via I/O path 402)the plurality of parameters, the plurality of advertisement slots, and aplurality of advertisement identifiers from any of media content source516, media guidance data source 518 and advertisement source 524.

At 704, control circuitry 404 may determine whether there are any morepreviously unselected parameters in the plurality of parameters. Forexample, control circuitry 404 may store all parameters to be processedin a data structure. The control circuitry may iterate through all theparameters selecting one parameter at a time for processing. During thefirst iteration there will be unselected parameters. However, after thefirst iteration, an iteration may be reached when all the parameters maybe processed. This signifies that all parameters were successfullyapplied. Thus, if all parameters were previously selected, process 700moves to 706, where the control circuitry transmits (e.g., via I/O path402) a message indicating that there is no conflict.

If there are more previously unselected parameters, process 700 moves toaction 708. At 708, the control circuitry selects a previouslyunselected parameter from the plurality of parameters. As exemplifiedabove, the control circuitry may store the plurality of parameters in adata structure (e.g., in storage 408). In some embodiments, the controlcircuitry may store each parameter in a plurality of parameters in adata structure and generate another data structure with pointers to eachparameter data structure. The control circuitry may maintain a record ofall parameters that have previously been selected and select apreviously unselected parameter by moving a pointer within a datastructure to the next parameter to be processed.

At 710, control circuitry 404 applies the previously unselectedparameter to the advertisement slot identifiers and the advertisementidentifiers in order to place advertisements associated with theadvertisement identifiers into advertisement slots associated withadvertisement slot identifiers. If the previously unselected parameteris the first parameter, the control circuitry may apply the parameter.However, if the previously unselected parameter is not the firstparameter selected, the control circuitry may retrieve (e.g., fromstorage 408) a saved state of different iterations of the applyingaction and apply the current parameter to the saved state. It should benoted that the saved state may be retrieved from a remote server (e.g.,a server associated with media content source 516, media guidance datasource 518 and/or advertisement source 524). When the control circuitryattempts to apply the previously unselected parameter to placeadvertisements into advertisement slots, the control circuitry maytransform the parameters into mathematical terms (e.g., a parameter maybe associated with a number of time slots that is needed to satisfy theparameter). The control circuitry may retrieve from the saved state anumber of advertisement slots that are available. If the number ofadvertisement slots available is greater than or equal to the number ofadvertisement slots required by the transformed parameter, the controlcircuitry may assign the appropriate number of advertisement slots tothe parameter and save (e.g., in storage 408) the state. The controlcircuitry may generate a success code for the operation if the requiredadvertisement slots were available. If the number of advertisement slotsavailable is less than what is required by the transformed parameter,the control circuitry may generate a failure code or an error code. Insome embodiments, the control circuitry may generate metadata related tothe failure (e.g., parameter that caused the error, the number ofadvertisement slots that are needed to apply the parameter successfully,and other suitable metadata). The control circuitry may store thefailure or success code along with metadata in storage 408 or at aremote server (e.g., a server associated with media content source 516,media guidance data source 518, and/or advertisement source 524).

At 712, the control circuitry determines whether the applying step hascompleted successfully. For example, the control circuitry may retrievethe success or failure code and the associated metadata to determinewhether the retrieve code corresponds to success or failure. If theapplying has not completed successfully, process 700 moves to step 714,where control circuitry 404 determines that there is a conflict thatprevents assigning of the plurality of advertisements to the pluralityof advertisement slots without violating a parameter of the plurality ofparameters. For example, if the retrieved code corresponds to a failurecode, the control circuitry may determine that there is a conflict. Thecontrol circuitry may store the determination as an error code ortransmit the error code to another routine.

If the control circuitry determines that the applying has completedsuccessfully, process 700 moves to step 716, where the control circuitrysaves the state of different iterations of the applying action,including the latest iteration. Process 700 then moves to action 704,where the control circuitry again determines whether there are any morepreviously unselected parameters.

FIG. 8 depicts an illustrative process for calculating a total parameterscore. At 802, control circuitry 404 retrieves a plurality of parameterscores for the plurality of parameters. The control circuitry mayretrieve the parameter scores from storage 408. In some embodiments, thecontrol circuitry may retrieve the parameter scores from a remove server(e.g., a server associated with media content source 516, media guidancedata source 518, and/or advertisement source 524). At 804, controlcircuitry 404 initializes a total parameter score. For example, thecontrol circuitry may instantiate a variable to be used for the totalparameter score and store the variable in storage (e.g., storage 408) tobe accessed at a later time.

At 806, control circuitry 404 determines whether there are any morepreviously unselected parameter scores. The control circuitry maygenerate a data structure for all parameter scores and maintain a recordof all the parameters that have been previously selected. The controlcircuitry may determine based on the record whether all parameter scoreshave been selected. If all parameter scores have previously beenselected, process 800 moves to 808, where control circuitry 404 stores(e.g., in storage 408) the total parameter score. If all parameterscores have not yet been previously selected, process 800 moves to 810where control circuitry 404 selects a previously unselected parameterscore. For example, the control circuitry may retrieve from the datastructure storing all parameter scores a parameter score that has notbeen yet been selected based on the record.

At 812, control circuitry 404 adds the previously unselected parameterscore to the total parameter score. Process 800 then moves to action 806and continues onward until all parameters have been processed (i.e.,selected).

FIG. 9 depicts an illustrative process for determining one or moreconflict parameters whose removal from the advertisement assignmentmodel resolves the conflict. At 902, control circuitry 404 ranks eachparameter of the plurality of parameters based on a respective parameterscore, where the highest-ranked parameter is associated with a lowestparameter score and the lowest-ranked parameter is associated with thehighest parameter score. For example, the control circuitry may iteratethrough each parameter and retrieve for each parameter a correspondingparameter score. The control circuitry may compare each retrievedparameter score to other previously retrieved parameter scores and placethe retrieved parameter score in order.

At 904, control circuitry 404 determines whether there are any morepreviously unselected parameters. For example, the control circuitry maybe maintaining a record of all parameters that have been previouslyselected. All parameters that have been previously selected are thoseparameters that have been compared to different configurations ofparameters that resolve the conflict and the previous comparisons havenot been successful. Thus, if all parameters have been previouslyselected, the result is that the conflict cannot be resolved. Therefore,process 900 moves to 906, where control circuitry 404 indicates that aconflict cannot be resolved. For example, the control circuitry maygenerate for display a notification to a user that the conflict cannotbe resolved. In some embodiments, the control circuitry may transmit amessage to a user or users in the form of an email or another suitableformat indicating that the conflict cannot be resolved.

However, if there are more previously unselected parameters, process 900moves to 908, where control circuitry 404 selects a previouslyunselected highest-ranked parameter and adds the previously unselectedparameters to the plurality of selected parameters. For example, thecontrol circuitry may access a data structure that stores the parametersin the ranked order and retrieve the highest-ranked parameter that hasnot been selected yet. The control circuitry may mark the parameterselected by updating a field in the data structure (e.g., a Boolean fromfalse to true, or vice versa).

At 910, control circuitry 404 generates a second plurality of parametersby removing the previously unselected highest-ranked parameter of theplurality of parameters. The control circuitry may generate a datastructure and place into the data structure each parameter or a pointerto each parameter, without place into the data structure the currentlyselected parameter. The control circuitry may store the data structurein storage 408 or at a remote server (e.g., a server associated withmedia content source 516, media guidance data source 518, oradvertisement source 524).

At 912, control circuitry 404 compares that second plurality ofparameters with each of a plurality of configurations of parameter,where each configuration of the plurality of configurations is one thatdoes not cause a conflict. For example, the control circuitry maycompare identification values associated with each parameter in order todetermine whether two parameters (one from a specific configuration andone from the second plurality of parameters) match. The controlcircuitry may iterate through each configuration in order to determinewhether any configuration matches the second plurality of parameters(i.e., where a configuration includes parameters identical to the secondplurality of parameters).

At 914, control circuitry 404 determines whether any configuration ofthe plurality of configurations matches the second plurality ofparameters. The control circuitry may make the configuration based onthe comparison at 912. If a configuration of the plurality ofconfigurations matches the second plurality of parameters, process 900moves to 916, where control circuitry 404 determines that the at leastone conflict parameters is the last selected highest-ranked parameter.If no configuration of the plurality of configurations matches thesecond plurality of parameters, process 900 moves to 918.

At 918, control circuitry 404 generates a plurality of sets ofparameters to compare with the plurality of configurations ofparameters, where each set includes a different combination ofpreviously selected parameters. The control circuitry may access a datastructure that stores all parameters and identify parameters that havebeen previously selected. The control circuitry may generate a datastructure for each different combination of previously selectedparameters. For example, if the first, second, and third parameters werepreviously selected, the control circuitry may generate a first datastructure for the first parameter and the second parameter, a seconddata structure for the first and third parameter, a third data structurefor the second and third parameter, and a fourth data structure for thefirst, second, and third parameters. The control circuitry may placeinto the data structure all the parameters and then remove theparameters in the corresponding combination. The control circuitry maycompare each data structure with each configuration of parameters thatresolves the conflict in order to determine whether parameters in one ofthe sets match the parameters of one of the configurations.

At 920, control circuitry 404 determines whether any set of parametersmatches any configuration of parameters when the parameters of each setare compared with the parameters of each configuration. If the controlcircuitry determines that a set of parameters matches a configuration ofparameters when the parameters of each set are compared with theparameters of each configuration process 900 moves to 922. At 922,control circuitry 404 determines that the at least one parameter is thepreviously selected parameters that are not in the matching set. Forexample, the control circuitry may store (e.g., in storage 408) setsgenerated above together with the corresponding combinations. Thecontrol circuitry may access the parameters of the correspondingcombination and identify those parameters as the at least one conflictparameter. If the control circuitry determines that no set of parametersmatches a configuration of parameters when the parameters of each setare compared with the parameters of each configuration process 900 movesto 904 where it proceeds as described above.

It is contemplated that the steps or descriptions of FIGS. 6-10 may beused with any other embodiment of this disclosure. In addition, thesteps and descriptions described in relation to FIG. 6-10 may be done inalternative orders or in parallel to further the purposes of thisdisclosure. For example, each of these steps may be performed in anyorder or in parallel or substantially simultaneously to reduce lag orincrease the speed of the system or method.

The above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are presentedfor purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the presentdisclosure is limited only by the claims that follow. Furthermore, itshould be noted that the features and limitations described in any oneembodiment may be applied to any other embodiment herein, and flowchartsor examples relating to one embodiment may be combined with any otherembodiment in a suitable manner, done in different orders, or done inparallel. In addition, the systems and methods described herein may beperformed in real time. It should also be noted, the systems and/ormethods described above may be applied to, or used in accordance with,other systems and/or methods.

1-51. (canceled)
 52. A method for resolving advertisement placementconflicts, the method comprising: accessing a proposed assignment of aplurality of advertisements to a plurality of advertisement slots;accessing a plurality of parameters defining preferred advertisementassignment; determining, based on the proposed assignment, whether thereis a conflict that prevents assigning the plurality of advertisements tothe plurality of advertisement slots without violating a parameter of aplurality of parameters; in response to determining that there is aconflict: generating a plurality of different configurations of theplurality of parameters by iteratively removing or modifying one or moreof the plurality of parameters using a feasibility relaxation algorithmfor mixed integer linear programs; generating for display a subset ofthe plurality of different configurations; and in response to a userselection of one of the plurality of different configurations, modifyingthe plurality of parameters according to the selected configuration; andassigning the plurality of advertisements to the plurality ofadvertisement slots based on the plurality of parameters.
 53. The methodof claim 52 further comprising accessing a parameter score for eachparameter of the plurality of parameters by: retrieving a parameterscore for each parameter of the plurality of parameters; generating afirst subset of parameters in the plurality of parameters, wherein eachparameter in the first subset of parameters has an associateduser-defined parameter score and a system parameter score; determining,for each parameter in the first subset of parameters, whether the systemparameter score can be overridden by the user-defined parameter score;generating a second subset of parameters that includes parameters fromthe first subset of parameters with system parameter scores that can beoverridden; generating a third subset of parameters that includesparameters from the first subset of parameters with system parameterscores that cannot be overridden; and retrieving user-defined parameterscores for the second subset and system parameter scores for the thirdsubset.
 54. The method of claim 52, further comprising determining atleast one conflict parameter whose removal from the plurality ofparameters causes the conflict to be resolved by: ranking each parameterof the plurality of parameters based on a respective parameter score,wherein the highest-ranked parameter is associated with a lowestparameter score and the lowest-ranked parameter is associated with thehighest parameter score; selecting a second plurality of parameters byremoving the highest-ranked parameter from the plurality of parameters;comparing the second plurality of parameters with parameters of eachconfiguration of the different configurations; determining, based oncomparing the second plurality of parameters with parameters of eachconfiguration of the different configurations, whether the secondplurality of parameters matches any configuration of the differentconfigurations; and in response to determining that the second pluralityof parameters matches a configuration of the different configurations,determining that the at least one conflict parameter is thehighest-ranked parameter.
 55. The method of claim 54, furthercomprising: in response to determining that the second plurality ofparameters does not match any configuration of the differentconfigurations, selecting a third plurality of parameters by removingthe second highest-ranked parameter from the first plurality ofparameters; comparing the third plurality of parameters with parametersof each configuration of the different configurations; determining,based on comparing the third plurality of parameters with parameters ofeach configuration of the different configurations, that the thirdplurality of parameters does not match any configuration of thedifferent configurations; comparing a fourth plurality of parameterswith parameters of each of the different configurations, wherein thefourth plurality of parameters comprises the first plurality ofparameters without both the highest-ranked parameter and the secondhighest-ranked parameter; and in response to determining that parametersof any configuration of the different configurations matches the fourthplurality of parameters, determining that the at least one conflictparameter includes the highest-ranked parameter and the secondhighest-ranked parameter.
 56. The method of claim 52 further comprising:determining a first configuration of the plurality of parameters fromthe different configurations that violates the smallest number ofparameters and minimizes a number of conflict parameters by: selecting,from the different configurations, a set of configurations with thelowest change to the total parameter score; determining, for eachconfiguration in the set of configurations, a number of removed conflictparameters; and selecting a configuration from the set of configurationswith the smallest number of removed conflict parameters.
 57. The methodof claim 52 further comprising determining a first configuration of theplurality of parameters from the different configurations that violatesthe smallest number of parameters and minimizes a number of conflictparameters removed from the plurality of parameters by: selecting, fromthe different configurations, a set of configurations with a smallestnumber of removed conflict parameters; determining, for eachconfiguration in the set of configurations, a change in a respectivetotal parameter score; and selecting a configuration from the set ofconfigurations with a smallest change in the respective total parameterscore.
 58. The method of claim 52, further comprising determining atleast one conflict parameter whose removal from the plurality ofparameters causes the conflict to be resolved by: ranking each parameterof the plurality of parameters based on a respective parameter score,wherein the highest-ranked parameter is associated with a lowestparameter score and the lowest-ranked parameter is associated with thehighest parameter score; splitting the highest-ranked parameter into afirst sub-parameter and a second sub-parameter; generating a set ofparameters that includes the plurality of parameters without thehighest-ranked parameter; simulating the assignment of the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on set ofparameters and the first sub-parameter; determining, based on simulatingthe assignment of the plurality of advertisements to the plurality ofadvertisement slots based on a set of parameters and the firstsub-parameter that there is no conflict that prevents assigning theplurality of advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slotswithout violating at least one of the first sub-parameter and the set ofparameters; and determining that removal of the highest-ranked parameterand addition of the first sub-parameter resolves the conflict.
 59. Themethod of claim 58, further comprising determining whether thehighest-ranked parameter can be split into multiple sub-parameters by:determining whether the highest-ranked parameter is associated with aplurality of advertisers and a plurality of advertisement slots;simulating splitting the highest-ranked parameter into a plurality ofsub-parameters, wherein each sub-parameter of the plurality ofsub-parameters is associated with one advertiser and at least oneadvertisement slot; and in response to successfully simulating thesplitting, determining that the highest-ranked parameter can be splitinto multiple parameters.
 60. The method of claim 52, wherein theaccessing a plurality of parameters defining preferred advertisementassignment further comprises receiving the plurality of parameters via anetwork.
 61. The method of claim 52, further comprising calculating aplurality of different total parameter scores based on the plurality ofdifferent configurations of the plurality of parameters, wherein eachcalculated different total parameter score is based on the removal fromthe plurality of parameters, or modification within the plurality ofparameters, of different ones of the at least one conflict parameter.62. A system for resolving advertisement placement conflicts, the systemcomprising: output circuitry; and control circuitry configured to:access a proposed assignment of a plurality of advertisements to aplurality of advertisement slots; access a plurality of parametersdefining preferred advertisement assignment; determining, based on theproposed assignment, whether there is a conflict that prevents assigningthe plurality of advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slotswithout violating a parameter of the plurality of parameters; inresponse to determining that there is a conflict: generate a pluralityof different configurations of the plurality of parameters byiteratively removing or modifying one or more of the plurality ofparameters using a feasibility relaxation algorithm for mixed integerlinear programs; generate for display, using the output circuitry, asubset of the plurality of different configurations; and in response toa user selection of one of the plurality of different configurations,modify the plurality of parameters according to the selectedconfiguration; and assign the plurality of advertisements to theplurality of advertisement slots based on the plurality of parameters.63. The system of claim 62, wherein the control circuitry is furtherconfigured to access a parameter score for each parameter of theplurality of parameters by: generating a first subset of parameters inthe plurality of parameters, wherein each parameter in the first subsetof parameters has an associated user-defined parameter score and asystem parameter score; determining, for each parameter in the firstsubset of parameters, whether the system parameter score can beoverridden by the user-defined parameter score; generating a secondsubset of parameters that includes parameters from the first subset ofparameters with system parameter scores that can be overridden;generating a third subset of parameters that includes parameters fromthe first subset of parameters with system parameter scores that cannotbe overridden; and retrieving user-defined parameter scores for thesecond subset and system parameter scores for the third subset.
 64. Thesystem of claim 62, wherein the control circuitry is further configuredto determine at least one conflict parameter whose removal from theplurality of parameters causes the conflict to be resolved by: rankingeach parameter of the plurality of parameters based on a respectiveparameter score, wherein the highest-ranked parameter is associated witha lowest parameter score and the lowest-ranked parameter is associatedwith the highest parameter score; selecting a second plurality ofparameters by removing the highest-ranked parameter from the pluralityof parameters; comparing the second plurality of parameters withparameters of each configuration of the different configurations;determining, based on comparing the second plurality of parameters withparameters of each configuration of the different configurations,whether the second plurality of parameters matches any configuration ofthe different configurations; and in response to determining that thesecond plurality of parameters matches a configuration of the differentconfigurations, determining that the at least one conflict parameter isthe highest ranked parameter.
 65. The system of claim 64, wherein thecontrol circuitry is further configured to: in response to determiningthat the second plurality of parameters does not match any configurationof the different configurations, select a third plurality of parametersby removing the second highest-ranked parameter from the first pluralityof parameters; compare the third plurality of parameters with parametersof each configuration of the different configurations; determine, basedon comparing the third plurality of parameters with parameters of eachconfiguration of the different configurations, that the third pluralityof parameters does not match any configuration of the differentconfigurations; compare a fourth plurality of parameters with parametersof each of the different configurations, wherein the fourth plurality ofparameters comprises the first plurality of parameters without both thehighest-ranked parameter and the second highest-ranked parameter; and inresponse to determining that parameters of any configuration of thedifferent configurations matches the fourth plurality of parameters,determine that the at least one conflict parameter includes thehighest-ranked parameter and the second highest-ranked parameter. 66.The system of claim 62, wherein the control circuitry is furtherconfigured to determine the first configuration of the plurality ofparameters from the different configurations that violates the smallestnumber of parameters and minimizes a number of conflict parametersremoved from the plurality of parameters by: selecting, from thedifferent configurations, a set of configurations with the lowest changeto the total parameter score; determine, for each configuration in theset of configurations, a number of removed conflict parameters; andselecting a configuration from the set of configurations with thesmallest number of removed conflict parameters.
 67. The system of claim62, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to determine thefirst configuration of the plurality of parameters from the differentconfigurations that violates the smallest number of parameters andminimizes a number of conflict parameters removed from the plurality ofparameters by: selecting, from the different configurations, a set ofconfigurations with a smallest number of removed conflict parameters;determining, for each configuration in the set of configurations, achange in a respective total parameter score; and selecting aconfiguration from the set of configurations with a smallest change inthe respective total parameter score.
 68. The system of claim 62,wherein the control circuitry is further configured to determine atleast one conflict parameter whose removal from the plurality ofparameters causes the conflict to be resolved by: ranking each parameterof the plurality of parameters based on a respective parameter score,wherein the highest-ranked parameter is associated with a lowestparameter score and the lowest-ranked parameter is associated with thehighest parameter score; splitting the highest-ranked parameter into afirst sub-parameter and a second sub-parameter; generating a set ofparameters that includes the plurality of parameters without thehighest-ranked parameter; simulating the assignment of the plurality ofadvertisements to the plurality of advertisement slots based on set ofparameters and the first sub-parameter; determining, based on simulatingthe assignment of the plurality of advertisements to the plurality ofadvertisement slots based on a set of parameters and the firstsub-parameter that there is no conflict that prevents assigning theplurality of advertisements to the plurality of advertisement slotswithout violating at least one of the first sub-parameter and the set ofparameters; and determining that removal of the highest-ranked parameterand addition of the first sub-parameter resolves the conflict.
 69. Thesystem of claim 68, wherein the control circuitry is further configuredto determine whether the highest-ranked parameter can be split intomultiple sub-parameters by: determining whether the highest-rankedparameter is associated with a plurality of advertisers and a pluralityof advertisement slots; simulating splitting the highest-rankedparameter into a plurality of sub-parameters, wherein each sub-parameterof the plurality of sub-parameters is associated with one advertiser andat least one advertisement slot; and in response to successfullysimulating the splitting, determining that the highest-ranked parametercan be split into multiple parameters.
 70. The system of claim 62,further comprising communications circuitry, and wherein the controlcircuitry is further configured to receive, using the communicationscircuitry, the plurality of parameters via a network.
 71. The system ofclaim 62, wherein the control circuitry is further configured tocalculate a plurality of different total parameter scores based on theplurality of different configurations of the plurality of parameters inthe plurality of parameters, wherein each calculated different totalparameter score is based on the removal from the plurality ofparameters, or modification within the plurality of parameters, ofdifferent ones of the at least one conflict parameter.